Herramienta Diagnostica para Evaluación Ergonómica de Puestos de Trabajo Aplicado a los Trabajadores del CIDC de la Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Fecha
Autor corporativo
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Compartir
Director
Altmetric
Resumen
Currently in Colombia job evaluation is developed in a subjective way, because it is carried out through observation, subject then to the expertise of the inspector's job, being unreliable established ergonomic analysis to starting from the position and movements of segments joint while work takes place. The general objective aims to generate a risk analysis biomechanical present in workers of the ICSD to create recommendations that guide the employer to develop a protocol for intervention from the implementation of the system of health management and safety at work. This thesis is a study of transverse type, told with a sample size of 14 workers of the ICSD of the Universidad Distrital Francisco José De Caldas, where was obtained as a result that the difference between the results taken subjectively and the taken with the TechNaid electronic equipment corresponds to stand collar joint presents the greatest discrepancy with a 2%, second joints of shoulder and elbow represent a divergence of 1.47% and 1.22%, respectively, in the hip joint corresponds to 1.09% and in knee and trunk percentage is 0.79% and 0.5%. Finally in the joints of the wrist and fingers there was an objective result given that electronic equipment TechNaid fails to determine the extent of these since they are short lever. We can conclude that the technaid is efficient in time, but should develop a methodology that can measure accurately distal wrist and fingers joints and thus perform evaluations of jobs for workers with upper limb musculoskeletal diseases. According to the above, the determination of the mean of the deviations is due to the fact that the subjective deviation has an average of 15.7% while the objective deviation by means of the TechNaid has an average of 9.08%, which allows indicate that there is less variability in the data with the measurement of the electronic equipment than through observation.