Jóvenes infractores, inclusión educativa y crisis escolar un acercamiento crítico.

Abstract

This paper aims to reveal the procedure gives young people considering offenders especially when the motives and satisfactions that come for the sake of the benefit of some head teachers, some teachers and especially the educational institution here is taken is not present as reference. In describing a diagnosis, a method and a look of strength from the young to the institutions and how are you resistances are not taken into account by the same state agencies and if they are used by institutions bonus groups that take advantage of their status to get the hegemonic society benefits allows them. In the observed institution strategies from higher education institutions they are implemented to give the young alleged actions of inclusion and believes that they are complex situations, immigration diversity, lack of interest from young person are solved adduced, talents and potential, strong social imbalance, and motifs of his condition moratorium marked as young offenders rather than being his criminal act, is the answer to an organization that definitely know their interests and wishes to impose conservation structures and power , a system that in the social, economic policy and especially cultural reality, is no longer brand such factors in its development. It shows that treatment to cases that are considered outside the normativities not provide a social treatment, let alone truly inclusive resocializing nor legal nor different than sanctioning is given to personal claims by the mere fact of being a director or hold positions power, or simply because they are part of manual or absolutist standards. Therefore it is not catered to their special conditions of physical and psychological development, and even the young child categories, ignoring these subjects as if really the social science had not advanced in their classification and consideration. The condition of subjects of law is clear only when you can use the "sake of collective welfare and even personal interests." In conclusion, it ratified a subject of law should be affirmed from the collective thinking from the perspective of individuals of the same right and the difference is also obvious and fundamental factor of true inclusion. The following work is left as proof that the condition of the offender should eliminate personal considerations and must be inserted in a system from becoming young, look real factors of development of talent and potential that linking a valid e ilusionantemente social structure pursuing beyond its hegemonic conservation organization, outdated, punitive and exclusionary real actions from the social and human.