Geovisor proyecto ODCA: Un instrumento de análisis de la conflictividad socioambiental en Bogotá, D.C.

dc.contributor.advisorMartínez Abello, Jairo Miguel
dc.contributor.authorTraslaviña Quiroga, Kelly Camila
dc.contributor.orcidMartínez Abello, Jairo Miguel [0000-0003-1791-408X]
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-15T18:08:14Z
dc.date.available2025-10-15T18:08:14Z
dc.date.created2025-10-02
dc.descriptionEl proyecto Geovisor ODCA: Un instrumento de análisis de la conflictividad socioambiental en Bogotá, D.C. tiene como propósito desarrollar una plataforma interactiva que organice y visibilice los conflictos ambientales identificados en la ciudad. A partir de la base de datos construida por el Observatorio Distrital de Conflictos Ambientales (ODCA), se diseñó un geovisor que integra información georreferenciada, herramientas SIG y una interfaz web accesible. Esta herramienta permite analizar patrones espaciales, visualizar dinámicas territoriales y fortalecer procesos de gobernanza ambiental urbana. Los resultados muestran que el geovisor no solo contribuye a la comprensión de la complejidad socioambiental de Bogotá, sino que también promueve la participación ciudadana y la democratización del conocimiento, consolidándose como un instrumento estratégico para la planificación territorial y la toma de decisiones en la ciudad.
dc.description.abstractThe project ODCA Geovisor: An Instrument for Analysing Socio-Environmental Conflicts in Bogotá, D.C. aims to develop an interactive platform that organises and makes visible the environmental conflicts identified in the city. Based on the database created by the District Observatory of Environmental Conflicts (ODCA), a geovisor was designed to integrate georeferenced information, GIS tools, and an accessible web interface. This tool enables the analysis of spatial patterns, the visualisation of territorial dynamics, and the strengthening of urban environmental governance processes. The results demonstrate that the geovisor not only contributes to understanding Bogotá’s socio-environmental complexity but also fosters citizen participation and the democratisation of knowledge, becoming a strategic instrument for territorial planning and decision-making in the city.
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11349/99458
dc.publisherUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
dc.relation.referencesAlberti, M. (2015). Eco-evolutionary dynamics in an urbanizing planet. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.007
dc.relation.referencesAlimonda, H. (2011). La colonialidad de la naturaleza: una aproximación a la ecología política latinoamericana. En H. Alimonda (Coord.), La naturaleza colonizada: ecología política y minería en América Latina (pp. 21-58). CLACSO.
dc.relation.referencesAndersson, E., Barthel, S., Borgström, S., Colding, J., Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., & Gren, Å. (2014). Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio, 43(4), 445–453.
dc.relation.referencesAndrade, G. I., Remolina, F., & Wiesner, D. (2013). Assembling the pieces: a framework for the integration of multi-functional ecological main structure in the emerging urban region of Bogotá, Colombia. Urban Ecosystems, 16(4), 723–739.
dc.relation.referencesAndraus C., Ramírez, E. (2024). Análisis de la identidad visual corporativa de los medios periodísticos digitales de Manabí. Revista San Gregorio, 1(58), 63-69.
dc.relation.referencesBabbie, E. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
dc.relation.referencesBai, X., McAllister, R. R., Beaty, R. M., & Taylor, B. (2010). Urban policy and governance in a global environment: Complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 129-135.
dc.relation.referencesBattersby, S. E., Finn, M. P., Usery, E. L., & Yamamoto, K. H. (2014). Implications of Web Mercator and its use in online mapping. Cartographica, 49(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.3138/carto.49.2.2313
dc.relation.referencesBrenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2-3), 151-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
dc.relation.referencesBrewer, C. A. (2005). Designing better maps: A guide for GIS users. ESRI Press.
dc.relation.referencesBurrough, P. A., McDonnell, R. A., & Lloyd, C. D. (2015). Principles of geographical information systems (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198742845.001.0001
dc.relation.referencesCardona, R., & Sánchez, L. (2021). Urban environmental challenges in Latin American megacities: The case of Bogotá. Urban Studies, 58(14), 2891-2908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020967340
dc.relation.referencesCastells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
dc.relation.referencesChang, K. T. (2019). Introduction to geographic information systems (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09633-X
dc.relation.referencesCollins, J. P., Kinzig, A., Grimm, N. B., Fagan, W. F., Hope, D., Wu, J., & Borer, E. T. (2011). A new urban ecology: Modeling human communities as integral parts of ecosystems poses special problems for the development and testing of ecological theory. American Scientist, 88(5), 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1511/2000.5.416
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesDent, B. D., Torguson, J. S., & Hodler, T. W. (2009). Cartography: Thematic map design (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
dc.relation.referencesElwood, S. (2006). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer, 58(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00526.x
dc.relation.referencesEnvironmental Systems Research Institute. (2023). ArcGIS Pro: Release 3.1. ESRI. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro
dc.relation.referencesEnvironmental Systems Research Institute. (2023). ArcGIS Pro: File geodatabase. ESRI. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/overview/file-geodatabases.htm
dc.relation.referencesEscobar, A. (2011). Ecología política de la globalidad y la diferencia. En H. Alimonda (Coord.), La naturaleza colonizada: ecología política y minería en América Latina (pp. 61-92). CLACSO.
dc.relation.referencesEscobedo, F. J., Clerici, N., Staudhammer, C. L., & Tovar-Corzo, G. (2015). Socio-ecological dynamics and inequality in Bogotá, Colombia's public urban forests and their ecosystem services. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 1040-1053.
dc.relation.referencesEsri. (s. f.-a). Configure pop-ups (Map Viewer). ArcGIS Online Help. Recuperado de https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-online/create-maps/configure-pop-ups-mv.htm
dc.relation.referencesFlick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesGoodchild, M. F., & Li, L. (2012). Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics, 1, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013). Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235-245.
dc.relation.referencesGreenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
dc.relation.referencesGrimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864), 756-760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195
dc.relation.referencesHarvey, D. (2004). El nuevo imperialismo: acumulación por desposesión. Socialist Register, 40, 99-129.
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commission. (2013). Green Infrastructure (GI) — Enhancing Europe's Natural Capital. COM(2013) 249 final.
dc.relation.referencesHarvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso Books.
dc.relation.referencesKaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Fetishizing the modern city: The phantasmagoria of urban technological networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1), 120-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00239
dc.relation.referencesKennedy, C., Pincetl, S., & Bunje, P. (2011). The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9), 1965-1973.
dc.relation.referencesKraak, M. J., & Ormeling, F. (2020). Cartography: Visualization of geospatial data (4th ed.). CRC Press.
dc.relation.referencesLongley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information science and systems (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118676646
dc.relation.referencesMacEachren, A. M. (2004). How maps work: Representation, visualization, and design. Guilford Press.
dc.relation.referencesMartínez Abello, J. M. (2023). La ciudad en disputa: conflictos socioambientales en Bogotá D. C. Ciudad Paz-ando, 16(1), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.14483/2422278X.20604
dc.relation.referencesMcHarg, I. L., & Mumford, L. (2006). Design with nature (25th anniversary ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relation.referencesMeerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
dc.relation.referencesMerlinsky, G. (2013). Cartografías del conflicto ambiental en Argentina. CLACSO.
dc.relation.referencesMerlinsky, G. (2017). Infraestructuras, ambiente y conflicto urbano. En G. Merlinsky (Comp.), Cartografías del conflicto ambiental en Argentina II (pp. 89-112). CLACSO.
dc.relation.referencesMitchell, A. (2005). The ESRI guide to GIS analysis, volume 2: Spatial measurements and statistics. ESRI Press.
dc.relation.referencesMoraes, A. C., & da Costa, W. M. (2009). Geografía crítica. La valorización del espacio. Ítaca.
dc.relation.referencesOlaya, V. (2020). Sistemas de Información Geográfica. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
dc.relation.referencesPabón-Caicedo, J. D. (2012). Cambio climático en Colombia: tendencias en la segunda mitad del siglo XX y escenarios posibles para el siglo XXI. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 36(139), 261-278.
dc.relation.referencesPardo Martínez, C. I. (2015). Energy and sustainable development in cities: A case study of Bogotá. Energy, 92, 612-621.
dc.relation.referencesPickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Boone, C. G., Groffman, P. M., Irwin, E., Kaushal, S. S., Marshall, V., McGrath, B., Nilon, C. H., Pouyat, R. V., Szlavecz, K., Troy, A., & Warren, P. (2011). Urban ecological systems: Scientific foundations and a decade of progress. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, A., Domínguez, E., & Borrero, I. (2018). Contaminación atmosférica y efectos en la salud de la población de Bogotá. Revista de la Universidad Industrial de Santander. Salud, 50(2), 116-125.
dc.relation.referencesRamírez-Agudelo, N. A., Villero-Páez, C. A., Jaramillo-Cardona, C., & Ramírez-Ríos, V. (2020). Geospatial analysis of ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: A case study of Medellín Metropolitan Area. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 82, 106360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106360
dc.relation.referencesRocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., & Wangari, E. (1996). Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experiences. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, J. D., & Bernal, J. F. (2017). El Marco Geocéntrico Nacional de Referencia: MAGNA-SIRGAS. Revista Colombiana de Geografía, 26(1), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v26n1.57725
dc.relation.referencesSecretaría Distrital de Ambiente. (2023). Informe de Conflictos Ambientales en Bogotá. Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesSlocum, T. A., McMaster, R. B., Kessler, F. C., & Howard, H. H. (2009). Thematic cartography and geovisualization (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.referencesSnyder, J. P. (1987). Map projections—A working manual. U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1395
dc.relation.referencesSwyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
dc.relation.referencesSwyngedouw, E., & Heynen, N. C. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35(5), 898-918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.x
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relation.referencesTorres, M., & Vargas, J. (2009). Environmental conflicts and urban governance in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 41(3), 579-607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X09990113
dc.relation.referencesUN-Habitat. (2022). World cities report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
dc.relation.referencesUrban, D., & Keitt, T. (2001). Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82(5), 1205-1218. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2
dc.relation.referencesWu, J. (2014). Urban ecology and sustainability: The state-of-the-science and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018
dc.relation.referencesZeiler, M. (2010). Modeling our world: The ESRI guide to geodatabase concepts (2nd ed.). ESRI Press.
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.subjectGeovisor
dc.subjectConflictos socioambientales
dc.subjectSIG
dc.subjectGobernanza ambiental
dc.subject.keywordSocio-environmental conflicts
dc.subject.keywordGIS
dc.subject.keywordGeovisor
dc.subject.keywordEnvironmental governance
dc.subject.lembAdministración Ambiental -- Tesis y disertaciones académicas
dc.subject.lembMediación ambiental
dc.subject.lembSistemas de Información Geográfica
dc.subject.lembGestión ambiental
dc.subject.lembUrbanismo
dc.titleGeovisor proyecto ODCA: Un instrumento de análisis de la conflictividad socioambiental en Bogotá, D.C.
dc.title.titleenglishGeovisor ODCA Project: An Instrument for the Analysis of Socio-environmental Conflict in Bogotá, D.C.
dc.typebachelorThesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.degreeInvestigación-Innovación

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
TraslaviñaQuirogaKellyCamila2025.pdf
Tamaño:
2.38 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Licencia de uso y publicación.pdf
Tamaño:
272.21 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
7 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: