Análisis y evaluación a las acciones adelantadas en los planes de mejoramiento. Vigencia 2016 - 2018 por parte de la Unidad Administrativa Especial de Catastro Distrital, en desarrollo de la auditoría de regularidad adelantada por la Contraloría de Bogotá

Abstract

Within the process of developing the internship modality in the Contraloría De Bogotá, a temporary analysis of the improvement and verification plans of the cadastral conservation and cadastral updating processes was carried out by the Unidad Administrativa Especial of Catastro Distrital - UAECD for the properties of the city of Bogotá both urban and rural areas. The work developed within the present internship was to analyze, compare and technically support the aspects that concern the efficiency and effectiveness of the processes, the analysis was done through the purification of the information provided by the UAECD comparing this with the information repositories such as the Sistema Integrado de Información Catastral – SIIC, la Ventanilla Única de Registro – VUR, the Cartographic Viewer, among others, which allow to validate that the information is the most reliable with the reality of the properties and real estate. Another of the tasks developed within the internship is the process of analysis, evaluation and conclusion of the actions advanced to the improvement plan proposed by the UAECD to the control entity seeking to correct and improve the processes presented in previous regularity audits in which evidenced flaws that affect the cadastral processes; the reflection of this is the administrative findings with presumed disciplinary incidence or fiscal findings with presumed disciplinary incidence the latter is seen to have a negative influence. Losses are caused in the areas of the district. Therefore, the real sums of the tax Impuesto Predial Unificado IPU no longer receive. Finally, results are obtained 18 situations that reflect deficiencies in the aforementioned processes of which 3 are administrative with fiscal incidence and presumed disciplinary incidence, 11 are administrative with presumed disciplinary incidence and 4 are presumed disciplinary incidence.