Perspectives of Knowledge Construction From a Collaborative Learning Process Mediated by an Instagram Group

dc.contributor.advisorCandia Hurtado, Martha Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorCárdenas Corredor, Sebastián
dc.contributor.authorArias Muñoz , Gustavo Adolfo
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-13T18:18:28Z
dc.date.available2026-02-13T18:18:28Z
dc.date.created2025-09-25
dc.descriptionLa investigación examinó el potencial educativo de los grupos de Instagram en la enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera, con un enfoque específico en la construcción colaborativa del conocimiento. Surgiendo del desafío del uso excesivo de las redes sociales durante las clases, el estudio buscó transformar esta potencial distracción en una valiosa oportunidad de aprendizaje. El equipo de investigación empleó una metodología cualitativa, recolectando datos a través de una combinación de observaciones en el aula, diarios reflexivos y entrevistas semiestructuradas. La intervención implementó un marco de aprendizaje basado en tareas que integró grupos de Instagram en el proceso educativo, con estudiantes de múltiples instituciones educativas participando en actividades diseñadas para aprovechar su experiencia en redes sociales mientras promovían la construcción colaborativa del conocimiento. Los hallazgos demostraron que la integración de las redes sociales mejoró significativamente el aprendizaje colaborativo a través de múltiples mecanismos. Los estudiantes participaron en el intercambio activo de información, se beneficiaron de oportunidades de aprendizaje experiencial y participaron en la construcción del conocimiento a través de la interacción entre pares. El estudio reveló que los grupos de Instagram, cuando están adecuadamente estructurados e implementados, pueden apoyar efectivamente la enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera, transformándose exitosamente de potenciales distracciones en el aula a valiosas herramientas educativas. Sin embargo, la investigación también identificó varias consideraciones críticas para una implementación exitosa, incluyendo la necesidad de capacitación integral para los docentes, el establecimiento de pautas claras para mantener el enfoque educativo y la importancia de equilibrar cuidadosamente la participación con las potenciales distracciones. Las conclusiones sugirieron que este enfoque tiene aplicaciones más amplias en diversos contextos educativos, mientras se reconoce la necesidad de investigación adicional para estudiar la efectividad a largo plazo y desarrollar las mejores prácticas de implementación.
dc.description.abstractThe research examined the educational potential of Instagram groups in EFL learning, with a specific focus on collaborative knowledge construction. Arising from the challenge of excessive social media use during class time, the study sought to transform this potential distraction into a valuable learning opportunity. The research team employed a qualitative methodology, collecting data through a combination of classroom observations, reflective journals, and semi-structured interviews. The intervention implemented a task-based learning framework that integrated Instagram groups into the educational process, with students from multiple educational institutions participating in activities designed to leverage their social media experience while promoting collaborative knowledge construction. The findings demonstrated that social media integration significantly enhanced collaborative learning through multiple mechanisms. Students engaged in active information sharing, benefited from experiential learning opportunities, and participated in knowledge construction through peer interaction. The study revealed that Instagram groups, when properly structured and implemented, can effectively support elf education, successfully transforming from potential classroom distractions to valuable educational tools. However, the research also identified several critical considerations for successful implementation, including the necessity for comprehensive teacher training, the establishment of clear guidelines to maintain educational focus, and the importance of carefully balancing engagement with potential distractions. The conclusions suggested that this approach has broader applications across various educational contexts, while acknowledging the need for further research to investigate long-term effectiveness and develop best implementation practices. These findings contribute to the growing body of research on technology integration in education and provide practical insights for educators seeking to leverage social media platforms for educational purposes.
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11349/100393
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
dc.relation.referencesAlkhowaiter, W. (2016). The power of Instagram in building small businesses. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 59–64). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_6
dc.relation.referencesBarber, W. (2020). Building Creative Critical Online Learning Communities through Digital Moments. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.34190/jel.18.5.002
dc.relation.referencesBarrot, J. S. (2021). Social media as a language learning environment: a systematic review of the literature (2008-2019). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2534–2562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1883673
dc.relation.referencesBeldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789498
dc.relation.referencesBlake, R. (2008). Brave new digital classroom: technology and foreign language learning. https://doi.org/10.1353/book13058
dc.relation.referencesBoruzie, P. K., Kolog, E. A., Afful-Dazie, E., & Egala, S. B. (2022). Social network for collaborative learning: what are the determining factors? Universal Access in the Information Society, 23(3), 1015–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00942-3
dc.relation.referencesBowers, J. (2008). Cyber “Pokes”: motivational antidote for developmental college readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 39(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2008.10850313
dc.relation.referencesBoyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: the social lives of networked teens. Choice Reviews Online, 51(12), 51–7042. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-7042
dc.relation.referencesBrown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018001032
dc.relation.referencesBruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the “Conversation of Mankind.” College English, 46(7), 635. https://doi.org/10.2307/376924
dc.relation.referencesBuehl, M. M., & Fives, H. (2009). Exploring teachers’ beliefs about teaching knowledge: Where does it come from? does it change? The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.3200/jexe.77.4.367-408
dc.relation.referencesCastrillón-Ángel, E. F. (2025). Critical digital literacy. Funlam. https://www.academia.edu/73485980/CRITICAL_DIGITAL_LITERACY
dc.relation.referencesChang, H. (2016). Autoethnography as method. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315433370
dc.relation.referencesChun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches 4 edition. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. https://library.umw.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=1755&keywords=
dc.relation.referencesDe Mesa, J. C., Gómez-Jacinto, L., Peláez, A. L., & Erro-Garcés, A. (2020). Social Networking Sites and Youth Transition: The use of Facebook and Personal Well Being of Social Work Young Graduates. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00230
dc.relation.referencesDeCarvalho, R. J. (1992). The founders of humanistic psychology. Choice Reviews Online, 29(10), 29–5967. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-5967
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2012). Manual de investigación cualitativa. Dialnet. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=490631
dc.relation.referencesDillenbourg, P. (1999). Chapter 1 (Introduction) What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? Hal Science. https://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/teaching/aei/papiers/Dillenbourg.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDownes, S. (2010). New technology supporting informal learning. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4304/jetwi.2.1.27-33
dc.relation.referencesDriscoll, M. P. (1993). Psychology of learning for instruction. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA23062408
dc.relation.referencesEdwards, E., & Burns, A. (2015). Language teacher action research: achieving sustainability: table 1. ELT Journal, 70(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv060
dc.relation.referencesFernández, M. R., Del Carmen Garrido, M., & Porras, I. (2022). Curricular integration of digital technologies in teaching processes. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1005499
dc.relation.referencesFoley, J. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (Fourth Edition). The New English Teacher, 8(1), 162–164. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/newEnglishTeacher/article/view/13
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the Knowledge-Base of Language Teacher Education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588114 Gauvain, M. (2019). Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 446–454). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.23569-4
dc.relation.referencesGee, E., & Gee, J. P. (2017). Games as distributed teaching and learning systems. Teachers College Record the Voice of Scholarship in Education, 119(12), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711901202
dc.relation.referencesGee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in Education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322
dc.relation.referencesGill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. BDJ, 204(6), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, N., Zerpa, M. L., Gutierrez, D., & Pirela, C. (2007). La investigación educativa en el hacer docente. Laurus, 13(23), 279–309. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/761/76102315.pdf
dc.relation.referencesGreenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2015a). Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
dc.relation.referencesGreenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2015b). Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
dc.relation.referencesHague, & Payton. (2011). Digital literacy across the curriculum. The National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales. http://cmslive.curriculum.edu.au/leader/digital_literacy_across_the_curriculum,33211 .html?issueID=12380
dc.relation.referencesHarden, R., Laidlaw, J., & Ker, J. (2000). Task Based Learning an educational strategy for undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education. Taylor and Francis Online. https://repository.globethics.net/handle/20.500.12424/2368140
dc.relation.referencesHeinze, A., & Procter, C. (2006). Online Communication and Information Technology education. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 5, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.28945/245
dc.relation.referencesHofer, B. K. (2016). Epistemic Cognition as a Psychological Construct: Advancements and Challenges. Routledge, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795225-9
dc.relation.referencesHofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834
dc.relation.referencesJones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. http://perpustakaanbadanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/slims/index.php?p=show_detail&id =18192&keywords=
dc.relation.referencesKember, D. (2001). Beliefs about Knowledge and the Process of Teaching and Learning as a Factor in Adjusting to Study in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070125401
dc.relation.referencesKember, D. (2002). Long-term outcomes of educational action research projects. Educational Action Research, 10(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790200200174
dc.relation.referencesKenton, W. (2024, August 22). What is social networking? Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/social-networking.asp
dc.relation.referencesKincheloe, J. L. (2008). Knowledge and critical pedagogy. In Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8224-5
dc.relation.referencesKoehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2013). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. In Springer eBooks (pp. 101–111). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
dc.relation.referencesKolb, D. A. (1983). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB1767575X
dc.relation.referencesLaal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
dc.relation.referencesLantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the genesis of second language development. http://archives.umc.edu.dz/handle/123456789/111146?show=full
dc.relation.referencesLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815355
dc.relation.referencesLee, C. D., Smagorinsky, P., Freedman, S. W., Simons, E. R., & Casareno, A. (2000). Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research: Constructing Meaning through Collaborative Inquiry. In Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805216/30955/frontmatter/9780521630955_frontmatte r.pdf
dc.relation.referencesLeinonen, T., & Durall, E. (2013). Design thinking and collaborative learning. Comunicar, 21(42), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.3916/c42-2014-10
dc.relation.referencesLennon, A., & Wollin, A. (2001). Learning organisations: empirically investigating metaphors. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930110409697
dc.relation.referencesLeu, D., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. (2013). New Literacies: A Dual-Level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In International Reading Association eBooks (pp. 1150–1181). https://doi.org/10.1598/0710.42
dc.relation.referencesLiao, Y., Huang, Y., Chen, H., & Huang, S. (2014). Exploring the antecedents of collaborative learning performance over social networking sites in a ubiquitous learning context. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.028
dc.relation.referencesMahmud, M. M., & Wong, S. F. (2018). Facebook and Collaborative Learning: An Empirical study on online assessment. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 107 113. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.4.2.107-113
dc.relation.referencesMalik, A., Heyman-Schrum, C., & Johri, A. (2019). Use of Twitter across educational settings: a review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0166-x
dc.relation.referencesMarshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Choice Reviews Online, 27(02), 27–1232. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-123
dc.relation.referencesMazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2006). I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The Effects of Computer-Mediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520601009710
dc.relation.referencesMcCarroll, N., & Curran, K. (2013). Social networking in education. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/jide.2013010101
dc.relation.referencesNasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004449
dc.relation.referencesOhara, M. R. (2023). The role of social media in educational Communication Management. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.25
dc.relation.referencesOrtlipp, M. (2015). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1579
dc.relation.referencesOskarita, N. E., & Arasy, N. H. N. (2024). The role of digital tools in enhancing collaborative learning in secondary Education. International Journal of Educational Research., 1(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijer.v1i1.15
dc.relation.referencesPBL Research. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf
dc.relation.referencesPapacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808099577
dc.relation.referencesPapert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating Constructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
dc.relation.referencesPérez, R. G., Catalán, Á. R., & Pérez, C. G. (2016). Relación entre las preferencias de formación del profesorado y su competencia digital en las redes sociales. Bordón Revista De Pedagogía, 68(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2016.68209
dc.relation.referencesPiaget, J. (2005). The Psychology of Intelligence. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203981528
dc.relation.referencesPierce, W. D., & Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 2(3), 321. https://doi.org/10.2307/3340496
dc.relation.referencesPujiati, H., Zahra, N., & Tamela, E. (2019). The use of Instagram to increase students’ motivation and students’ competence in learning English. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education Social Sciences and Humanities (ICESSHum 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/icesshum-19.2019.103
dc.relation.referencesQuintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
dc.relation.referencesRennie, F. (2008). E-Learning and Social Networking handbook. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927762
dc.relation.referencesRennie, F., & Morrison, T. (2013). E-Learning and Social Networking handbook. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203120279
dc.relation.referencesRichardson, B. (1990). Book reviews: Nunan, D. 1988: Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin (Utrecht), 6(2), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839000600207
dc.relation.referencesRyan, S. D., Magro, M. J., & Sharp, J. H. (2011). Exploring Educational and Cultural Adaptation through Social Networking Sites. Journal of Information Technology Education Innovations in Practice, 10, 001–016. https://doi.org/10.28945/1346
dc.relation.referencesSher, P. J., & Lee, V. C. (2003). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information & Management, 41(8), 933–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.06.004
dc.relation.referencesSiemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: a Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). http://jotamac.typepad.com/jotamacs_weblog/files/Connectivism.pdf
dc.relation.referencesStahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. ResearchGate, 409–426. http://gerrystahl.net/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf
dc.relation.referencesTang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Using Twitter for education: Beneficial or simply a waste of time? Computers & Education, 106, 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.00
dc.relation.referencesThorne, S. L., Hellermann, J., & Jakonen, T. (2021). Rewilding language education: emergent assemblages and entangled actions. Modern Language Journal, 105(S1), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12687
dc.relation.referencesThorne, S. L., & Reinhardt, J. (2013). “Bridging activities,” new media literacies, and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v25i3.558-572
dc.relation.referencesUsing observations to improve teacher practice: How states can build Meaningful observation Systems. (2015, July). Reform Support Network.
dc.relation.referencesVan Lier, L. (2010). The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory to practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.005
dc.relation.referencesWheeler, B. C., Alavi, M., & Valacich, J. S. (1995). Creating and using the collaborative telelearning environment. International Conference on Information Systems, 389. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&context=icis1995
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Harlow Longman. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. (n.d.). https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1776513
dc.relation.referencesWittrock, M. C. (1978). Developmental Processes in Learning from Instruction. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 132(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1978.10533314
dc.relation.referencesZhu, H. (2013). Looking back at the new knowledge bases of EFL teacher education. Creative Education, 04(12), 752–756. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.412106
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.subjectInstagram
dc.subjectInglés como lengua extranjera
dc.subjectColaboración
dc.subjectConstrucción de conocimiento
dc.subjectRedes sociales
dc.subjectAprendizaje por tareas
dc.subjectIntegración educativa
dc.subject.keywordInstagram
dc.subject.keywordEnglish as a foreign language
dc.subject.keywordCollaboration
dc.subject.keywordKnowledge Construction
dc.subject.keywordSocial Media
dc.subject.keywordTask based learning
dc.subject.keywordEducational integration
dc.subject.lembLicenciatura en Educación básica con Énfasis en Inglés -- Tesis y disertaciones académicas
dc.subject.lembAprendizaje colaborativo — Entornos virtuales
dc.subject.lembConstrucción del conocimiento — Procesos educativos
dc.subject.lembRedes sociales en línea — Uso educativo
dc.titlePerspectives of Knowledge Construction From a Collaborative Learning Process Mediated by an Instagram Group
dc.title.titleenglishPerspectives of Knowledge Construction From a Collaborative Learning Process Mediated by an Instagram Group
dc.typebachelorThesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.degreeMonografía
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
CardenasCorredorSebastian2025.pdf
Tamaño:
1.41 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
CardenasCorredorSebastian2025Anexos.zip
Tamaño:
526.42 KB
Formato:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Licencia de uso y publicacion.pdf
Tamaño:
619.78 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
7 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: