Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorGaona Garcia, Paulo Alonso
dc.contributor.authorMontenegro Marín, Carlos Enrique
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Moncunil, David
dc.contributor.orcidGaona Garcia, Paulo Alonso [0000-0002-8758-1412]
dc.contributor.orcidMartín-Moncunil, David [0000-0003-2422-9005]
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-03T01:17:49Z
dc.date.available2023-11-03T01:17:49Z
dc.date.created2018-04
dc.descriptionActualmente existen repositorios y bibliotecas digitales que dan acceso a miles de recursos cataloga dos y organizados de acuerdo a las descripciones de sus colecciones. Esta gran cantidad de recursos en su mayoría no tienen un alcance y/o visibilidad que permita ser consultados en su totalidad por los actuales métodos de búsquedas convencionales, como los son motores de búsquedas textuales. Bajo esta premisa, el presente libro plantea una serie de estrategias de búsqueda visuales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento (ontologías y tesauros), mediante el uso de inter faces navegacionales que permitan mejorar las condiciones actuales de acceso a la mayoría de estas colecciones de recursos digitales. Para ello se utilizarán principios de diseños centrado en usuario y aspectos relacionados con usabilidad, con el propósito de explorar posibles formas para desplegar información dentro de una colección de recursos digitales alojados en un repositorio, y analizar sus diferencias con el fin de llegar a conclusiones que permitan identificar ventajas y desventajas de cada una de ellas para su implementaciónspa
dc.description.abstractCurrently there are repositories and digital libraries that give access to thousands of resources cataloged and organized according to the descriptions of their collections. Most of this large number of resources do not have a scope and/or visibility that allows them to be consulted in their entirety by current conventional search methods, such as textual search engines. Under this premise, this book proposes a series of visual search strategies based on knowledge representation schemes (ontologies and thesauri), through the use of navigational interfaces that allow improving the current conditions of access to the majority of these collections. of digital resources. To do this, user-centered design principles and aspects related to usability will be used, with the purpose of exploring possible ways to display information within a collection of digital resources hosted in a repository, and analyzing their differences in order to reach conclusions that allow you to identify advantages and disadvantages of each of them for their implementationspa
dc.description.cityBogotáspa
dc.format.mimetypepdfspa
dc.identifier.editorialUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Centro de Investigaciones y Desarrollo Científicospa
dc.identifier.isbn978-958-787-004-6spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11349/32620
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEspaciosspa
dc.relation.referencesAgosti, M., Crivellari, F., Deambrosis, G., Ferro, N., Gäde, M., Petras, V. & Stiller, J. (2009). D2. 1.1–Report on User Preferences and Information Retrieval Scenarios for Multilingual Access in Europeana. EuropeanaConnect, ECP-2008-DILI- 528001. Recuperado de http://www.europeanaconnect.eu/documents/D2.1.1_eConnect_Report_User_Preferences_MLIA_v1.0_20091222.zipspa
dc.relation.referencesAgrovoc, 2017. Tesauro multilingüe de agricultura. Recuperado de http://aims.fao.org/es/agrovocspa
dc.relation.referencesAitchison, J., Gilchrist, A. & Bawden, D. (2001). Thesaurus construction and use: a practical manual (7th ed). Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers,spa
dc.relation.referencesAitta, M., Kaleva, S. & Kortelainen, T. (2008). Heuristic evaluation applied to library web services. New Library World, 109(1/2), 25-45.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlva, M., Martínez, A., Suárez, M., Labra, J., Cueva, J. & Sagastegui, H. (2010). Towards the evaluation of usability in educative websites. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 145-161.spa
dc.relation.referencesAllan, J., Leuski, A., Swan, R. & Byrd, D. (2001). Evaluating combinations of ranked lists and visualizations of inter-document similarity. Information processing & management, 37(3), 435-458.spa
dc.relation.referencesAllen, R., Obry, P. & Littman, M. (1993). An interface for navigating clustered document sets returned by queries. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the conference on Organizational computing systems, Milpitas, California, United States.spa
dc.relation.referencesANSI/NISO. (2005). ANSI/NISO Z39.19 Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies. National Information Standards Organization (Estados Unidos): American National Standards Institutespa
dc.relation.referencesArano, S. & Codina, L. (2004). La estructura conceptual de los tesauros en el entorno digital: nuevas esperanzas para viejos problemas. Jornades Catalanes d’Infornació i Documentació, 9, 14.spa
dc.relation.referencesArmstrong, C., Fenton, R., Lonsdale, R., Stoker, D., Thomas, R. & Urquhart, C. (2001). A study of the use of electronic information systems by higher education students in the UK. Program: electronic library and information systems, 35(3), 241-262.spa
dc.relation.referencesAroyo, L., Dolog, P., Houben, G., Kravcik, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M. & Wild, F. (2006). Interoperability in personalized adaptive learning. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 4-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesAula, A. & Käki, M. (2005). Less is more in Web search interfaces for older adults. First Monday, 10(7-4).spa
dc.relation.referencesBaeza, R. & Castillo, C. (2004). Crawling the infinite Web: five levels are enough. Algorithms and Models for the Web-Graph, 3243, 156-167.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, K. (2006). Learning objects and process interoperability. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(1), 167-172.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarton, J., Currier, S. & Hey, J. (2003). Building quality assurance into metadata creation: an analysis based on the learning objects and e-prints communities of practice. Paper presented at the Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice - Metadata Research and Applications, September 28 - October 2 (2003), Seattle, Washington, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesBattista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R. & Tollis, I. (1998). Graph drawing: algorithms for the visualization of graphs. Prentice Hall PTR.spa
dc.relation.referencesBederson, B., Shneiderman, B. & Wattenberg, M. (2002). Ordered and Quantum Treemaps: Making Effective Use of 2D Space to Display Hierarchies. ACM Transactions on Computer Graphic, 21(4), 833-854.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenford, S., Snowdon, D., Greenhalgh, C., Ingram, R., Knox, I. & Brown, C. (1995). VR- VIBE: A Virtual Environment for Co-operative Information Re- trieval. Computer Graphics Forum, 14(3), 349-360. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.1995.cgf143_0349.xspa
dc.relation.referencesBevan, N. & Macleod, M. (1994). Usability measurement in context. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13(1-2), 132-145.spa
dc.relation.referencesBizer, C., Heath, T. & Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3), 1-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlanch, R. & Lecolinet, E. (2007). Browsing Zoomable Treemaps: Structure-Aware Multi- Scale Navigation Techniques. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 13(6), 1248-1253. doi: 10.1109/tvcg.2007.70540spa
dc.relation.referencesBlocks, D., Binding, C., Cunliffe, D. & Tudhope, D. (2002). Qualitative evaluation of thesaurus-based retrieval. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 346-361, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoldi, P., Codenotti, B., Santini, M. & Vigna, S. (2004). Ubicrawler: A scalable fully distributed web crawler. Software: Practice and Experience, 34(8), 711-726.spa
dc.relation.referencesBooth, P. (1989). An introduction to human-computer interaction. London, UK: Psychology Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoren, T. & Ramey, J. (2000). Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 43(3), 261-278.spa
dc.relation.referencesBostock, M. & Heer, J. (2009). Protovis: A graphical toolkit for visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6), 1121-1128.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoulos, M., Warren, J., Gong, J. & Yue, P. (2010). Web GIS in practice VIII: HTML5 and the canvas element for interactive online mapping. International journal of health geographics, 9(1), 14.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrachman, R. & Schmolze, J. (1985). An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive science, 9(2), 171-216.spa
dc.relation.referencesBremm, S., Von Landesberger, T., Hess, M., Schreck, T., Weil, P. & Hamacherk, K. (2011). Interactive visual comparison of multiple trees. Paper presented at the VAST 2011 - IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology 2011, Proceedings, 31-40. doi:10.1109/VAST.2011.6102439spa
dc.relation.referencesBruce, T. & Hillmann, D. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting. Chicago, IL: D.Hillman & E.Westbrooks (Eds.).spa
dc.relation.referencesBruno, D. & Richmond, H. (2003). The truth about taxonomies. Information management journal, 37(2), 48-52.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, S. & Salako, A. (2009). Evaluating the usability and usefulness of a digital library. Library Review, 58(9), 638-651.spa
dc.relation.referencesBui, Y. & Park, J. (2006). An assessment of metadata quality: A case study of the national science digital library metadata repository. H. Moukdad (ed.) Proceedings of CAIS/ ACSI 2006 Information Science Revisited: Approaches to Innovation, 13.spa
dc.relation.referencesButtenfield, B. (1999). Usability evaluation of digital libraries. Science & Technology Libraries, 17(3-4), 39-59.spa
dc.relation.referencesCard, S., Mackinlay, J. & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.146spa
dc.relation.referencesCastells, L. (2007). Los protocolos de pensamiento en voz alta como instrumento para analizar el proceso de escritura. Revista española de lingüística aplicada (20), 27- 36.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastells, P. (2002). Aplicación de técnicas de la web semántica. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, C. (2005). Effective web crawling. ACM Transactions on Computer Graphic, 39, 55-56.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, L. (2006). Elaboración de un tesauro de información de actualidad y conversión en red semántica para su empleo en un sistema de recuperación periodístico. Universidad de Valencia: Valencia.spa
dc.relation.referencesCavieres Abarca, A., Fredes Mena, S. & Ramírez Novoa, A. (2010). Tesauros y web semántica: diseño metodológico para estructurar contenidos web mediante SKOS-Core. Serie bibliotecología y gestión de información, (57), 1-64.spa
dc.relation.referencesCechinel, C., Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2009). Empirical analysis of errors on humangenerated learning objects metadata. Proceedings Metadata and Semantic Research Third International Conference, Milan, Italy, pp. 60-70.spa
dc.relation.referencesCechinel, C., Silva, S., Ochoa, X., Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2012). Populating Learning Object Repositories with Hidden Internal Quality Information. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning (RecSysTEL 2012). Manouselis, N., Draschler, H., Verber, K., and Santos, OC (Eds.). Published by CEUR Workshop Proceedings.spa
dc.relation.referencesCentelles, M. (2005). Taxonomías para la categorización y la organización de la información en sitios web. Hipertext.net.spa
dc.relation.referencesCervera, J., López, M., Fernández, C. & Sánchez, S. (2009). Quality metrics in learning objects. Metadata and Semantics, 135-141.spa
dc.relation.referencesCleveland, W. (1984). Graphs in scientific publications. Amer. Stat., 38(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesCleveland, W., Diaconis, P. & McGill, R. (1982). Variables on scatterplots look more highly correlated when the scales are increased. Defense Technical Information Center.spa
dc.relation.referencesClyphan, R. & Sugimoto. (2009). Europeana Semantic Element ESE v3.4.1. Recuperado de http://pro.europeana.eu/web/guest/technical-requirements/.spa
dc.relation.referencesCockburn, A. & McKenzie, B. (2000). An evaluation of cone trees. People and Computers XIV—Usability or Else. British Computer Society Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 425-436, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.spa
dc.relation.referencesCodina, L. (2000). Evaluación de recursos digitales en línea: conceptos, indicadores y métodos. Revista española de documentación científica, 23(1), 9-44.spa
dc.relation.referencesCorcho, O., Fernández, M. & Gómez, A. (2003). Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Data & knowledge engineering, 46(1), 41-64.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrockford, D. (2006). The application/json media type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON).spa
dc.relation.referencesCugini, J., Laskowski, S. & Sebrechts, M. (2000). Presenting search results: design, visualization and evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Information Doors. Where Information Search and Hypertext Link Workshop.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, C. (2004). Information visualization: Beyond the horizon. Springer, 2(16), 316.spa
dc.relation.referencesChirita, P., Gavriloaie, R., Ghita, S., Nejdl, W. & Paiu, R. (2005). Activity based metadata for semantic desktop search. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pp. 439-454, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.spa
dc.relation.referencesChrysafiadi, K. & Virvou, M. (2013). A knowledge representation approach using fuzzy cognitive maps for better navigation support in an adaptive learning system. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 81.spa
dc.relation.referencesChuanjun, S. (2004). On the Evaluation of the Quality of Digital Collections. The Journal of the Library Science in China, 4.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, P. & Connolly, M. (2007). Institutional repositories: evaluating the reasons for non- use of Cornell University’s installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4).spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, R., Shrobe, H. & Szolovits, P. (1993). What is a knowledge representation?. AI magazine, 14(1), 17.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe la Prieta, F. & Gil, A. (2010). A multi-agent system that searches for learning objects in heterogeneous repositories. Trends in Practical Applications of Agents and Multiagent Systems, 355-362.spa
dc.relation.referencesDesign, P. (1998). Visual Thesaurus. Recuperado de http://www.visualthesaurus.comspa
dc.relation.referencesDietze, S., Yu, H., Giordano, D., Kaldoudi, E., Dovrolis, N. & Taibi, D. (2012). Linked Education: interlinking educational Resources and the Web of Data. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing.spa
dc.relation.referencesDinkla, K., Westenberg, M., Timmerman, H., Van Hijum, S. & Van Wijk, J. (2011). Comparison of multiple weighted hierarchies: visual analytics for microbe community profiling. Computer Graphics Forum, 30, 1141-1150.spa
dc.relation.referencesDix, A., Janet, E., Abowd, G. & Beale, R. (2003). Human computer interaction. NY: Prentice-Hall, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoerr, M., Gradmann, S., Hennicke, S., Isaac, A., Meghini, C. & Van de Sompel, H. (2010). The Europeana Data Model (EDM). Paper presented at the Proceedings of IFLA, Gothenburg, Sweden.spa
dc.relation.referencesDownes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3.spa
dc.relation.referencesDraper, G., Livnat, Y. & Riesenfeld, R. (2009). A Survey of Radial Methods for Information Visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(5), 759-776. doi:10.1109/tvcg.2009.23spa
dc.relation.referencesDumas, J. & Redish, J. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. England: Intellect.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuncan, S. (2009). Patterns of learning object reuse in the Connexions repository. Tesis doctoral. Utah State University, Logan, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesDurkin, J. (1994). Expert systems: design and development. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.spa
dc.relation.referencesEades, P. & Sugiyama, K. (1990). How to Draw a Directed Graph J. Information Processing, 13(4), pp. 424-434.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdwards, J., McCurley, K. & Tomlin, J. (2001). An adaptive model for optimizing performance of an incremental web crawler. WWW Conference, Hong Kong, China.spa
dc.relation.referencesEnglish, J., Hearst, M., Sinha, R., Swearingen, K. & Lee, K. (2002). Flexible search and navigation using faceted metadata. Technical report, University of Berkeley, School of Information Management and Systems, 2003. Submitted for publication. Europeana, 2017. Europeana REST API. Recuperado de http://labs.europeana. eu/api/introduction.spa
dc.relation.referencesEuropeana. (2017b). Europeana Linked Open Data. Recuperado de http://labs.europeana.eu/api/linked-open-data-introduction.spa
dc.relation.referencesFang, X. & Holsapple, C. (2007). An empirical study of web site navigation structures’ impacts on web site usability. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 476-491.spa
dc.relation.referencesFekete, J. (2004). The infovis toolkit. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2004. INFOVIS 2004. IEEE Symposium on.spa
dc.relation.referencesFekete, J., Hémery, P., Baudel, T. & Wood, J. (2011). Obvious: A meta-toolkit to encapsulate information visualization toolkits—one toolkit to bind them all. Paper presented at the Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE Conference on.spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández, A. (2011). La construcción de tesauros académicos: un modelo general y un método inductivo con aplicación al “e-learning”. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España.spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández, J. (2001). Modelos de Recuperación de Información basados en Redes de Creencia. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Granada, España.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlouris, G., Plexousakis, D. & Antoniou, G. (2003). Describing knowledge representation schemes: A formal account. Technical Rep. No. TR-320, Institute of Computer Science—Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (ICS-FORTH), Crete, Greece.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoltz, M. (1997). An information space design rationale.spa
dc.relation.referencesFox, E., Gonçalves, M. & Kipp, N. (2002). Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training. Digital libraries, pp. 623-641, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.spa
dc.relation.referencesFox, E., Hix, D., Nowell, L., Brueni, D., Wake, W., Heath, L. & Rao, D. (1999). Users, user interfaces, and objects: Envision, a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(8), 480-491.spa
dc.relation.referencesFox, E. & Logan, E. (2005). An Asian digital libraries perspective. Information processing & management, 41(1), 1-4.spa
dc.relation.referencesFriesen, N. (2001). What are educational objects?. Interactive learning environments, 9(3), 219-230.spa
dc.relation.referencesFriesen, N. (2009). Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5).spa
dc.relation.referencesFrøkjær, E., Hertzum, M. & Hornbæk, K. (2000). Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesFulton, S. & Fulton, J. (2013). HTML5 Canvas: O’Reilly Media. Furnas, G. (1986). Generalized fisheye views (Vol. 17): ACM.spa
dc.relation.referencesFurnas, G. & Zacks, J. (1994). Multitrees: enriching and reusing hierarchical structure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesGaona-García, P., Martín, D., Fermoso, A. & Sánchez, S. (2014). A usability study of taxonomy-visualization user interfaces in digital repositories. Journal Online Information review, 38(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesGaona-García, P., Sánchez, S. & Gaona, E. (2013). Prototipo informático para extracción de recursos digitales sobre internet. Revista Tecnura, 17, 79-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesGaona-García, P., Sánchez, S. & Montenegro, C. (2014). Visualization of information: a proposal to improve the search and access to digital resources in repositories. Ingeniería e investigación, 34(1), 83-89.spa
dc.relation.referencesGaona-García, P., Fermoso-García, A. & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2017). Exploring the Relevance of Europeana Digital Resources: Preliminary Ideas on Europeana Metadata Quality/Exploración de la relevancia de los recursos digitales de Eu- ropeana: ideas preliminares sobre la calidad de los metadatos Europeana. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 40(1), 59.spa
dc.relation.referencesGašević, D., Djurić, D. & Devedzic, V. (2009). Model driven engineering and ontology development. Springerverlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.spa
dc.relation.referencesGašević, D. & Hatala, M. (2006). Ontology mappings to improve learning resource search. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 375-389.spa
dc.relation.referencesGenesereth, M. & Ketchpel, S. (1994). Software agents. Commun. ACM, 37(7), 48-53, 147.spa
dc.relation.referencesGero, J. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI magazine, 11(4), 26.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilchrist, A. (2003). Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies–an etymological note. Journal of documentation, 59(1), 7-18spa
dc.relation.referencesGleicher, M., Albers, D., Walker, R., Jusufi, I., Hansen, C. D. & Roberts, J. C. (2011). Visual comparison for information visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4), 289-309.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves, M., Moreira, B., Fox, E. & Watson, L. (2007). What is a good digital library? – A quality model for digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1416-1437. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.010.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, V. & Kobsa, A. (2003). Benefits of information visualization systems for administrative data analysts. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2003. IV 2003. Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, M. & Kennedy, J. (2005). Extending taxonomic visualisation to incorporate synonymy and structural markers. Information Visualization, 4(3), 206-223.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, M. & Kennedy, J. (2010). A survey of multiple tree visualisation. Information Visualization, 9(4), 235-252.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, M., Kennedy, J. & Benyon, D. (2000). Towards a methodology for developing visualizations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 789- 807.spa
dc.relation.referencesGranollers, T. (2004). MPIu+ a. Una metodología que integra la Ingeniería del Software, la Interacción Persona-Ordenador y la Accesibilidad en el contexto de equipos de desarrollo multidisciplinares. Tesis doctoral. Universitat de Lleida, España.spa
dc.relation.referencesGruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuarino, N. & Poli, R. (1995). Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 43(5), 625-640.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuha, R., McCool, R. & Miller, E. (2003). Semantic search. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarger, J. & Crossno, P. (2012). Comparison of open-source visual analytics toolkits. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Visualization and Data Analysis.spa
dc.relation.referencesHargittai, E. (2004). Classifying and coding online actions. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 210-227.spa
dc.relation.referencesHartson, H., Shivakumar, P. & Pérez, M. (2004). Usability inspection of digital libraries: a case study. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 4(2), 108-123.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaslhofer, B., & Isaac, A. (2011). Data Europeana. EU: The Europeana Linked Open Data Pilot. Paper presented at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 21 - 23 September 2011, The Hague, Netherlands.spa
dc.relation.referencesHassan, Y., Martín, F. & Iazza, G. (2004). Diseño web centrado en el usuario: usabilidad y arquitectura de la información. Hipertext.net (2).spa
dc.relation.referencesHayati, Z. & Jowkar, T. (2008). Adoption of electronic reference materials in academic libraries of Iran. The International Information & Library Review, 40(1), 52-63.spa
dc.relation.referencesHerman, I., Melancon, G. & Marshall, M. S. (2000). Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 6(1), 24-43. doi: 10.1109/2945.841119spa
dc.relation.referencesHearst, M. (1995). TileBars: visualization of term distribution information in full text information access. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesHearst, M. (2009). Search user interfaces. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHearst, M. & Karadi, C. (1997). Cat-a-Cone: an interactive interface for specifying searches and viewing retrieval results using a large category hierarchy. Paper presented at the ACM SIGIR Forum.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeer, J. & Bostock, M. (2010). Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 203-212.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeer, J., Card, S. & Landay, J. (2005). Prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeer, J., Kong, N. & Agrawala, M. (2009). Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesHemmje, M., Kunkel, C. & Willett, A. (1994). LyberWorld, a visualization user interface supporting fulltext retrieval. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.spa
dc.relation.referencesHetzler, E. & Turner, A. (2004). Analysis experiences using information visualization. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 24(5), 22-26.spa
dc.relation.referencesHitchcock, S., Woukeu, A., Brody, T., Carr, L., Hall, W. & Harnad, S. (2003). Evaluating Citebase, an open access Web-based citation-ranked search and impact discovery service. Monograph (Technical Report), University of Southampton, England.spa
dc.relation.referencesHodgins, W. & Conner, M. (2000). Everything you ever wanted to know about learning standards but were afraid to ask. Learning in the New Economy e-Magazine (Line Zine).spa
dc.relation.referencesHoffman, P., Grinstein, G., Marx, K., Grosse, I. & Stanley, E. (1997). DNA visual and analytic data mining. Paper presented at the Visualization 97´, Proceedings.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolzschuher, F. & Peinl, R. (2013). Performance of graph query languages: comparison of cypher, gremlin and native access in Neo4j. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Joint EDBT/ICDT 2013 Workshops.spa
dc.relation.referencesHowland, J., Jonassen, D. & Marra, R. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. Pearson Upper Saddle River, NJ.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, M., Liang, J. & Nguyen, Q. (2008). A Usability Study on the Use of Multi-Context Visualization. Paper presented at the CGIV ‘08. Fifth International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization, 26-28 Aug. 2008.spa
dc.relation.referencesHughes, B. (2005). Metadata quality evaluation: Experience from the open language archives community. Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross- Fertilization, 135-148.spa
dc.relation.referencesISO. (1985). ISO 5964-1985. Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri. Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/standard/12159.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesISO. (1998). ISO 9241 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - Part 11. Guidance on Usability. Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/ standard/16883.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesISO. (2001). ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001 Software product evaluation - Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use.spa
dc.relation.referencesJacob, R. & Karn, K. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. Mind, 2(3), 4.spa
dc.relation.referencesJain, P. & Babbar, P. (2006). Digital libraries initiatives in India. The International Information & Library Review, 38(3), 161-169.spa
dc.relation.referencesJeng, J. (2005). Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: Effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability. Libri, 55(2-3), 96-121.spa
dc.relation.referencesJeng, J. (2009). What should we take into consideration when we talk about usability? Tsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (eds.) Evaluation of digital libraries. An insight into useful applications and methods. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, pp. 63–73spa
dc.relation.referencesJovanović, J., Gašević, D., Knight, C. & Richards, G. (2007). Ontologies for effective use of context in e-learning settings. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 47- 59.spa
dc.relation.referencesKani, E., Ghinea, G. & Chen, S. Y. (2006). Digital libraries: what do users want? Online Information Review, 30(4), 395-412.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeim, D., Mansmann, F., Schneidewind, J. & Schreck, T. (2006). Monitoring network traffic with radial traffic analyzer. Paper presented at the Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2006 IEEE Symposium On.spa
dc.relation.referencesKelty, C., Burrus, C. & Baraniuk, R. (2008). Peer review anew: Three principles and a case study in postpublication quality assurance. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(6), 1000-1011.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhoo, M., Kusunoki, D. & MacDonald, C. (2012). Finding Problems: When Digital Library Users Act as Usability Evaluators. Paper presented at the System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on, 4-7 Jan. 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesKim, H. & Kim, Y. (2008). Usability study of digital institutional repositories. Electronic Library, The, 26(6), 863-881.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlerkx, J., Duval, E. & Meire, M. (2004). Using information visualization for accessing learning object repositories. 2004. IV 2004. Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, London, 465-470. doi: 10.1109/ iv.2004.1320185spa
dc.relation.referencesKlerkx, J., Meire, M., Ternier, S., Verbert, K. & Duval, E. (2005). Information visualisation: towards an extensible framework for accessing learning object repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications.spa
dc.relation.referencesKobsa, A. (2004). User experiments with tree visualization systems. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2004. INFOVIS 2004. IEEE Symposium on.spa
dc.relation.referencesKomlodi, A., Marchionini, G. & Soergel, D. (2007). Search history support for finding and using information: User interface design recommendations from a user study. Information Processing & Management, 43(1), 10-29. doi: 10.1016/j. ipm.2006.05.017spa
dc.relation.referencesKruskal, J. & Landwehr, J. (1983). Icicle plots: Better displays for hierarchical clustering. The American Statistician, 37(2), 162-168.spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, V., Nesbit, J. & Han, K. (2005). Rating learning object quality with distributed bayesian belief networks: The why and the how. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologies, 2005. ICALT 2005. Fifth IEEE International Conference on.spa
dc.relation.referencesLagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H., Johnston, P., Nelson, M., Sanderson, R. & Warner, S. (2007). Open Archives Initiative Object Reuse and Exchange (OAI-ORE). Technical report, Open Archives Initiative.spa
dc.relation.referencesLamping, J., Rao, R. & Pirolli, P. (1995). A focus+ context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesLamping, L. & Rao, R. (1996). The Hyperbolic Browser: A Focus+Context Technique for Visualizing Large Hierarchies. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 7(1), pp. 33-55.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, M., Reilly, R. & Butavicius, M. (2003). An empirical evaluation of Chernoff faces, star glyphs, and spatial visualizations for binary data. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, M. & Vickers, D. (1998). Psychological approaches to data visualisation: DTIC Document. Departament of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Australia.spa
dc.relation.referencesLei, M. (2008). Knowledge organization systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization, 35(2- 3), 160-182.spa
dc.relation.referencesLewis, C. (1982). Using the” thinking-aloud” method in cognitive interface design. IBM TJ Watson Research Center.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, J., Gasevic, D., Nesbit, J. & Richards, G. (2005). Ontology Mappings Enable Interoperation of Knowledge Domain Taxonomies. Paper presented at the 2nd LORNET international annual conference.spa
dc.relation.referencesLidwell, W., Holden, K. & Butler, J. (2010). Universal Principles of Design. 125 Ways to Enhance Usability, Influence Perception, Increase Appeal, Make Better Design Decisions, and Tech Through Design [25 Additional Design Principles]: Rockport publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiew, C. & Foo, S. (1999). Derivation of interaction environment and information object properties for enhanced integrated access and value-adding to electronic documents. Paper presented at the Aslib Proceedings.spa
dc.relation.referencesLin, X. (1997). Map displays for information retrieval. JASIS, 48(1), 40-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesLin, Y., Ahn, J., Brusilovsky, P., He, D. & Real, W. (2010). Imagesieve: Exploratory search of museum archives with named entity-based faceted browsing. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701217spa
dc.relation.referencesLindberg, D., Humphreys, B. & McCray, A. (1993). The Unified Medical Language System. Methods of information in medicine, 32(4), 281.spa
dc.relation.referencesLivnat, Y., Agutter, J., Moon, S., Erbacher, R. & Foresti, S. (2005). A visualization paradigm for network intrusion detection. Paper presented at the Information Assuran- ce Workshop, 2005. IAW’05. Proceedings from the Sixth Annual IEEE SMC.spa
dc.relation.referencesLongmire, W. (2000). A primer on learning objects. Learning Circuits, 1(3).spa
dc.relation.referencesLytras, M. & Sicilia, M. (2007). Where is the value in metadata? International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 2(4), 235-241.spa
dc.relation.referencesMackinlay, J. (1991). Search architectures for the automatic design of graphical presentations. ACM Press, New York, 281-292.spa
dc.relation.referencesMackinlay, J., Hanrahan, P. & Stolte, C. (2007). Show me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 13(6), 1137-1144.spa
dc.relation.referencesMangold, C. (2007). A survey and classification of semantic search approaches. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 2(1), 23-34.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarchionini, G. (1997). Information seeking in electronic environments. USA: Cambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesMarchionini, G. (1997). Information seeking in electronic environments. USA: Cambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesMarchionini, G. (2008). Human–information interaction research and development. Library & amp; Information Science Research, 30(3), 165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2008.07.001spa
dc.relation.referencesMarchionini, G. & White, R. (2010). Find what you need, understand what you find. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 23(3), 205-237.spa
dc.relation.referencesMargaryan, A. & Littlejohn, A. (2008). Repositories and communities at cross-purposes: issues in sharing and reuse of digital learning resources. 24, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00267.x (4)spa
dc.relation.referencesMartín-Moncunill, D., Sánchez, S., Gaona, P. & Marianos, N. (2013). Applying visualization techniques to develop interfaces for educational repositories: the case of Organic. Lingua and VOA3R. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Learning Innova- tions and Quality: The Future of Digital Resources, Rome.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcGreal, R. (2008). A typology of learning object repositories. Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training, 5-28.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcKay, D., Shukla, P., Hunt, R. & Cunningham, S. (2004). Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: three new approaches to browsing in Greenstone. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(4), 283-297.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerčun, T. & Žumer, M. (2009). Visualizing FRBR. Libraries in the Digital Age, LIDA 2009, 25-30 May, Dubrovnik and Zadar Croatia, 209-215.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerčun, T. & Žumer, M. (2010). Visualizing for explorations and discovery. Paper presented at the Proc. of the conf. on Libraries in the Digital Age, Zadar, Croatia.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerčun, T., Žumer, M. & Aalberg, T. (2012). FrbrVis: An Information Visualization Approach to Presenting FRBR Work Families Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. In P. Zaphiris, G. Buchanan, E. Rasmussen & F. Loizides (eds.), Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Vol. 7489, pp. 504-507, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiles, A., Matthews, B., Wilson, M. & Brickley, D. (2005). SKOS core: simple knowledge organisation for the web. Paper presented at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications “Metadata Vocabularies in Practice”, 12-15 September 2005, Leganés - Madrid, Spain.spa
dc.relation.referencesMizoguchi, R., Vanwelkenhuysen, J. & Ikeda, M. (1995). Task ontology for reuse of problem solving knowledge. Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building & Knowledge Sharing, 46-57.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoen, W., Stewart, E. & McClure, C. (1997). The role of content analysis in evaluating metadata for the us government information locator service (gils): results from an explora- tory study. GILSMDContentAnalysis.htm.spa
dc.relation.referencesMora, M. (2004). Interacción en interfaces de recuperación de información: conceptos, metáforas y visualización. Gijón: Trea.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorante, M. (2003). Usability guidelines for taxonomy development. Montague Institue Recuperado de http://www.montague.com/abstracts/usability.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesMuelder, C. & Ma, K. (2008). A treemap based method for rapid layout of large graphs. Paper presented at the Visualization Symposium, 2008. PacificVIS ‘08. IEEE Pacific, Tokio.spa
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz, J., Calvillo, E., Ochoa, C., Santaolaya, R. & Álvarez, F. (2010). Use of Agents to Realize a Federated Searching of Learning Objects. Trends in Practical Applica- tions of Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesNakayama, K., Hara, T. & Nishio, S. (2007,). A Thesaurus Construction Method from Large ScaleWeb Dictionaries. Paper presented at the Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2007. AINA ‘07. 21st International Conference on. 21-23 May 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesNash, S. (2005). Learning objects, learning object repositories, and learning theory. Preliminary best practices for online courses. Interdisc. J. E-Learn. Objects 1(1), 217-228.spa
dc.relation.referencesNeches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T. & Swartout, W. (1991). Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI magazine, 12(3), 36.spa
dc.relation.referencesNicholas, D., Huntington, P. & Jamali, H. (2007). The use, users, and role of abstracts in the digital scholarly environment. The journal of academic librarianship, 33(4), 446- 453.spa
dc.relation.referencesNielsen, J. (1994a). Guerrilla HCI: Using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier. Academic Press, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesNielsen, J. (1994b). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, California, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesNielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Recuperado de http://www.ingenieriasimple.com/usabilidad/IntroToUsability.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesNielsen, J., Snyder, C., Molich, R. & Farrell, S. (2001). E-commerce user experience. Nielsen Norman Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesNoik, E. (1993). Exploring large hyperdocuments: fisheye views of nested networks. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Hypertext, 192-205.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D. (2005). Human-centered design considered harmful. Interactions, 12(4), 14- 19.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D. (2008). Simplicity is not the answer. Interactions, 15(5), 45-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, X., Cardinaels, K., Meire, M. & Duval, E. (2005). Frameworks for the automatic indexation of learning management systems content into learning object repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, X. & Duval, E. (2006). Quality Metrics for learning object Metadata. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006, 1 March 2006, Orlando, Florida, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, X. & Duval, E. (2008). Relevance ranking metrics for learning objects. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 1(1), 34-48.spa
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, X. & Duval, E. (2009). Quantitative analysis of learning object repositories. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 2(3), 226-238.spa
dc.relation.referencesPancheshnikov, Y. (2007). Integrating print and digital resources in library collections. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 31(2), 111-112.spa
dc.relation.referencesPark, J. (2005). Semantic interoperability across digital image collections: A pilot study on metadata mapping. Proceedings Canadian Association for Information Science (CAIS).spa
dc.relation.referencesPark, J. (2009). Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(3-4), 213-228.spa
dc.relation.referencesPastor, J. (2009). Diseño de un sistema colaborativo para la creación y gestión de tesauros en Internet basado en SKOS. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerallos, A. (2007). Metodología ágil y adaptable al contexto para la evaluación integral y sistemática de la calidad de los sitios web. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, España.spa
dc.relation.referencesPetrelli, D. (2008). On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 22-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.01.024spa
dc.relation.referencesPirolli, P., Card, S. & Van Der Wege, M. (2001). Visual information foraging in a focus+ context visualization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlaisant, C., Grosjean, J. & Bederson, B. (2002). Spacetree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. Paper presented at the INFOVIS 2002. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesPolsani, P. (2006). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital information, 3(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesPolson, P. & Lewis, C. (1990). Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human–Computer Interaction, 5(2-3), 191-220.spa
dc.relation.referencesPoole, A. & Ball, L. (2006). Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of human-computer interaction (pp. 211-219). Pennsylvania: Idea Group Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrabha, C. (2007). Shifting from print to electronic journals in ARL university libraries. Serials Review, 33(1), 4-13.spa
dc.relation.referencesPullan, M., Watson, M., Kennedy, J., Raguenaud, C. & Hyam, R. (2000). The Prometheus Taxonomic Model: a practical approach to representing multiple classifications. Taxon, 55-75.spa
dc.relation.referencesPurday, J. (2009). Think culture: Europeana. Eu from concept to construction. The Electronic Library, 27(6), 919-937.spa
dc.relation.referencesQing, F. & Ruhua, H. (2008). Evaluating the usability of discipline repositories. Paper presented at the IT in Medicine and Education, 2008. ITME 2008. IEEE International Symposium on.spa
dc.relation.referencesReddy, M. & Wang, R. (1995). Estimating data accuracy in a federated database environment. In S. Bhalla (Ed.), Information Systems and Data Management, 1006, 115-134, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.spa
dc.relation.referencesRehak, D. & Mason, R. (2003). Keeping the learning in learning objects. Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning, 20-34.spa
dc.relation.referencesReilly, D. & Inkpen, K. (2007). White rooms and morphing don’t mix: setting and the evaluation of visualization techniques. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesRíos Hilario, A., Martín Campo, D. & Ferreras Fernández, T. (2012). Linked data y linked open data: su implantación en una biblioteca digital. El caso de Europeana. Recuperado de http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2012/mayo/10.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, J. (1995). Faculty knowledge about library services at the University of the West Indies. New Library World, 96(2), 14-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobertson, G., Mackinlay, J. & Card, S. (1991). Cone trees: animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosch, J.L. & Vogel-Walcutt, J.J. (2013). A review of eye-tracking applications as tools for training. Cognition, technology & work, 15(3), 313-327.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuecker, S. (2003). Affordances of prospect for academic users of interpretively-tagged text collections. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuecker, S., Radzikowska, M. & Sinclair, S. (2011). Visual interface design for digital cultural heritage: A guide to rich-prospect browsing. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, Farnham, Surrey.spa
dc.relation.referencesRussell, S., Norvig, P. & Davis, E. (2010). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 3rd edition.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2005). Normative specifications of learning objects and learning processes: towards higher levels of automation in standardized e- learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(3), 3-12.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2009). Using an AGROVOC-based ontology for the description of learning resources on organic agriculture. Metadata and Semantic, pp. 481-492, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.spa
dc.relation.referencesSantos, J., Ochoa, X., Parra, G. & Duval, E. (2011). La experiencia de ARIADNE: Creando una red de reutilización de objetos de aprendizaje a través de estándares y especificaciones. IEEE-RITA, 6(3), 112-117.spa
dc.relation.referencesSanz, J., Dodero, J. & Sánchez, S. (2009). A preliminary analysis of software engineering metrics-based criteria for the evaluation of learning objects reusability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 4(2009), 30- 34.spa
dc.relation.referencesSanz, J., Dodero, J. & Sánchez, S. (2011). Metrics-based evaluation of learning object reusability. Software Quality Journal, 19(1), 121-140.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchaffert, S. & Geser, G. (2008). Open educational resources and practices. E-Learning Papers, 7, 1-10.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchulz, H., Hadlak, S. & Schumann, H. (2011). Point-based visualization for large hierarchies. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(5), 598- 611.spa
dc.relation.referencesSebrechts, M., Cugini, J., Laskowski, S., Vasilakis, J. & Miller, M. (1999). Visualization of search results: a comparative evaluation of text, 2D, and 3D interfaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR con- ference on Research and development in information retrieval.spa
dc.relation.referencesShiri, A. (2008). Metadata-enhanced visual interfaces to digital libraries. Journal of Information Science, 34(6), 763-775.spa
dc.relation.referencesShiri, A. & Revie, C. (2005). Usability and user perceptions of a thesaurus-enhanced search interface. Journal of documentation, 61(5), 640-656.spa
dc.relation.referencesShiri, A., Revie, C. & Chowdhury, G. (2002). Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces. Journal of Information Science, 28(2), 111-122.spa
dc.relation.referencesShiri, A., Ruecker, S., Doll, L., Bouchard, M. & Fiorentino, C. (2011). An evaluation of thesaurus-enhanced visual interfaces for multilingual digital libraries. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 236-243, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.spa
dc.relation.referencesShneiderman, B. (1992). Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach. ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG), 11(1), 92-99.spa
dc.relation.referencesShneiderman, B. (2003). Designing the user interface. Pearson Education India.spa
dc.relation.referencesShneiderman, B., Feldman, D., Rose, A. & Grau, X. F. (2000). Visualizing digital library search results with categorical and hierarchical axes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, Rugensburg.spa
dc.relation.referencesShneiderman, B. & Johnson, B. (1991). Tree-maps: A space-Filling Approach to the Visualization of Hierarchical Information Structures. Proceedings of IEEE Information Visualization, pp. 175-282.spa
dc.relation.referencesShneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. (2005). Designing the user interface 4th edition. Ed: Pearson Addison Wesley, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesShneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. (2006). Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 AVI workshop on Beyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization.spa
dc.relation.referencesShreeves, S., Knutson, E., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C., Twidale, M. & Cole, T. (2005). Is ‘quality’ metadata ‘shareable’ metadata? The implications of local metadata practices for federated collections. In Proceedings of the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) 12th National Conference. Minneapolis, MN.spa
dc.relation.referencesShuler, J. (2007). Public Policies and Academic Libraries—The Shape of the Next Digital Divide. The journal of academic librarianship, 33(1), 141-143.spa
dc.relation.referencesShuling, W. (2007). Investigation and analysis of current use of electronic resources in university libraries. Library Management, 28(1/2), 72-88.spa
dc.relation.referencesSicilia, M. & Garcia, E. (2003). On the concepts of usability and reusability of learning objects. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesSicilia, M., Sánchez, S. & Benito, M. (2006). Estado de la cuestión de los objetos y diseños para el aprendizaje y su uso. Technical report, REDAOPA Red Temática de Actividades y Objetos para el Aprendizaje.spa
dc.relation.referencesSifer, M. (2003). Exploring web site log data with a multi-classification interface. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2003. IV 2003. Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimkin, D. & Hastie, R. (1987). An information-processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398), 454-spa
dc.relation.referencesSmoot, M., Ono, K., Ruscheinski, J., Wang, P. & Ideker, T. (2011). Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics, 27(3), 431-432.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoergel, D. (1995). The art and architecture thesaurus (AAT): A critical appraisal. Visual Resources, 10(4), 369-400.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoler, C. & Gil, I. (2010). Possibilities and limitations of thesauri in comparison with other systems of knowledge organization: folksonomies, taxonomies and ontologies. Rev. Interam. Bibliot, 361-377.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoto, C., Gordo, E. & Sánchez, S. (2007). Semantic learning object repositories. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 17(6), 432-446.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpence, I. (2005). No humble pie: The origins and usage of a statistical chart. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(4), 353-368.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpence, I. & Lewandowsky, S. (1991). Displaying proportions and percentages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 61-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesStace, C. (1991). Plant taxonomy and biosystematics (2nd edition ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesStafford, A., Shiri, A., Ruecker, S., Bouchard, M., Mehta, P., Anvik, K. & Rossello, X. (2008). Searchling: user-centered evaluation of a visual thesaurus-enhanced interface for bilingual digital libraries. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 117-121, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.spa
dc.relation.referencesStasko, J., Catrambone, R., Guzdial, M. & McDonald, K. (2000). An evaluation of space- filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 663-694.spa
dc.relation.referencesStawniak, M. (2012). Searching Content Related by Semantics, Space and Time. Interactive 3D Multimedia Content, pp. 223-251, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.spa
dc.relation.referencesStefaner, M., Dalla Vecchia, E., Condotta, M., Wolpers, M., Specht, M., Apelt, S. & Duval, E. (2007). MACE–enriching architectural learning objects for experience multiplication. Creating New Learning Experiences on a Global Scale, 4753, 322-336.spa
dc.relation.referencesStefaner, M. & Muller, B. (2007). Elastic lists for facet browsers. Paper presented at the Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2007. DEXA’07. 18th International Workshop on.spa
dc.relation.referencesStefaner, M., Wolpers, M., Memmel, M., Duval, E., Specht, M., Börner, D. & Klemke, R. (2009). MACE: Joint Deliverable “Evaluation of the MACE system”. The MACE Consortium.spa
dc.relation.referencesStojanovic, L., Staab, S. & Studer, R. (2001). E-Learning based on the Semantic Web. Paper presented at the WebNe001-World Conference on the WWW and Internet, Orlando, Florida, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesStrauch, C., Sites, U. & Kriha, W. (2011). NoSQL databases. Recuperado de http://www. christof-strauch. de/nosqldbs.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesStrong, D., Lee, Y. & Wang, R. (1997). Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103-110. doi: 10.1145/253769.253804spa
dc.relation.referencesStuckenschmidt, H., Vdovjak, R., Houben, G. & Broekstra, J. (2004). Index structures and algorithms for querying distributed RDF repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web.spa
dc.relation.referencesSutcliffe, A., Ennis, M. & Hu, J. (2000). Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 741-763.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwan, A. & Carr, L. (2008). Institutions, their repositories and the web. Serials Review, 34(1), 31-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwan, R. & Allan, J. (1998). Aspect windows, 3-D visualizations, and indirect comparisons of information retrieval systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.spa
dc.relation.referencesTadapak, P., Suebchua, T. & Rungsawang, A. (2010). A machine learning based language specific web site crawler. Paper presented at the Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS), 2010 13th International Conference on.spa
dc.relation.referencesTenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies. Paper presented at the Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington (2003).spa
dc.relation.referencesTernier, S., Verbert, K., Parra, G., Vandeputte, B., Klerkx, J., Duval, E. & Ochoa, X. (2009). The Ariadne Infrastructure for Managing and Storing Metadata. Internet Computing, IEEE, 13(4), 18-25. doi: 10.1109/mic.2009.90spa
dc.relation.referencesTilkov, S. & Vinoski, S. (2010). Node.js: Using JavaScript to Build High-Performance Network Programs. IEEE Internet Computing, 14(6), 80-83.spa
dc.relation.referencesTractinsky, N., Katz, A. & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with computers, 13(2), 127-145.spa
dc.relation.referencesTripathy, A. & Patra, P. (2008). A web mining architectural model of distributed crawler for internet searches using pagerank algorithm. Paper presented at the Asia- Pacific Services Computing Conference, 2008. APSCC ‘08. IEEE.spa
dc.relation.referencesTrust, J. (1988). Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT). Recuperado de http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/vocabularies/aat/about.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesTsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2006). Analysing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic information services. Journal of Information Science, 32(5), 400-419.spa
dc.relation.referencesTsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2007). Critical constructs of digital library interaction. Paper presented at the 11th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, 18-20 May, Πάτρα (GR).spa
dc.relation.referencesTsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2008). Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries. Information processing & management, 44(3), 1234-1250.spa
dc.relation.referencesTudhope, D., Binding, C., Blocks, D. & Cunliffe, D. (2006). Query expansion via conceptual distance in thesaurus indexed collections. Journal of documentation, 62(4), 509-533.spa
dc.relation.referencesTunkelang, D. (2009). Faceted search. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1-80.spa
dc.relation.referencesUddin, M. & Janecek, P. (2007). Performance and usability testing of multidimensional taxonomy in web site search and navigation. Performance measurement and metrics, 8(1), 18-33.spa
dc.relation.referencesUr Rehman, S. & Ramzy, V. (2004). Awareness and use of electronic information resources at the health sciences center of Kuwait University. Library Review, 53(3), 150-156.spa
dc.relation.referencesValente, A. (2005). Types and roles of legal ontologies. Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval and Applications, pp. 65-76, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.spa
dc.relation.referencesVessey, I. & Galletta, D. (1991). Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Reseatch, 2(1), 63-84.spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Landesberger, T., Kuijper, A., Schreck, T., Kohlhammer, J., Van Wijk, J., Fekete, J. & Fellner, D. (2011). Visual Analysis of Large Graphs: State-of-the-Art and Future Research Challenges. Computer Graphics Forum, Wiley, 30(6), 1719-1749. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01898.x (6)spa
dc.relation.referencesVora, P. (1998). Design/methods & tools: Designing for the web: a survey. Interac- tions, 5(3), 13-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesW3C, H. (2013). The canvas element (Editor’s Draft 24 July 2013). Recuperado de http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-canvas-element.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, R. & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 5-33.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, Z., Chaudhry, A. & Khoo, C. (2008). Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation. Journal of documentation, 64(6), 842-876.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeinberg, B. (1995). Art & Architecture Thesaurus and Guide to Indexing and Cata- loging with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(2), 152-160.spa
dc.relation.referencesWesterman, S. & Cribbin, T. (2000). Mapping semantic information in virtual space: dimensions, variance and individual differences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 765-787.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhite, R., Kules, B. & Drucker, S. (2006). Supporting exploratory search, introduc- tion, special issue, communications of the ACM. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 36-39.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhite, R. & Roth, R. (2009). Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1-98. doi: 10.2200/s00174ed1v01y200901icr003spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitehall, T. (1992). Quality in library and information service: a review. Library Management, 13(5), 23-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitehall, T. (1995). Value in library and information management: a review. Library Management, 16(4), 3-11.spa
dc.relation.referencesWiley, D. (2002a). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor and a taxonomy. In The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, Indiana, 2830(435), 3–24.spa
dc.relation.referencesWiley, D. (2002b). Instructional use of learning objects. Agency for Instructional Technology.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilkinson, L. & Wills, G. (2005). The grammar of graphics. Springer Science+ Business Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesWise, J. (1999). The ecological approach to text visualization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(13), 1224-1233.spa
dc.relation.referencesWittenburg, K., Das, D., Hill, W. & Stead, L. (1995). Group asynchronous browsing on the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the 4th International WWW Conference, Boston (MA).spa
dc.relation.referencesWu, M., Fuller, M. & Wilkinson, R. (2001). Using clustering and classification approaches in interactive retrieval. Information processing & management, 37(3), 459- 484.spa
dc.relation.referencesYtow, N., Morse, D. & Roberts, D. (2001). Nomencurator: a nomenclatural history model to handle multiple taxonomic views. Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 73(1), 81-98.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, X., Liu, J., Li, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2009). How usable are operational digital libraries: a usability evaluation of system interactions. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIG- CHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems, pp. 177-186, ACM.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhong, Y., Luo, Y., Pramanik, S. & Beaman, J. (1999). HICLAS: a taxonomic data- base system for displaying and comparing biological classification and phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 15(2), 149-156.spa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccessspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectOntologíasspa
dc.subjectTesaurosspa
dc.subjectInterfaces navegacionalesspa
dc.subjectRecursos digitalesspa
dc.subject.keywordOntologiesspa
dc.subject.keywordThesaurispa
dc.subject.keywordNavigational Interfacesspa
dc.subject.keywordDigital Resourcesspa
dc.subject.lembRepositorios digitalesspa
dc.subject.lembBúsqueda visualspa
dc.subject.lembWeb semánticaspa
dc.subject.lembRepresentación del conocimiento (Teoría de la información)spa
dc.titleEntornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimientospa
dc.title.titleenglishNavigational search environments based on knowledge representation schemes ​spa
dc.typebookspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales.pdf
Tamaño:
11.16 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
7 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Oficina de Investigaciones

  • Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - Biblioteca UDFJC

    Institución de Educación Superior sujeta a inspección y vigilancia por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional | Acuerdo de creación N° 10 de 1948 del Concejo de Bogotá  | Acreditación Institucional de Alta Calidad - Resolución N° 23096 del 15 de diciembre del 2016

     Calle 13 No. 31 - 75 Bogotá D.C. - República de Colombia |  (+57 1) 3239300  |  Lunes a viernes de 8 a.m. a 5 p.m.

    Contacto: repositorio@udistrital.edu.co