<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Análisis de la precisión entre modelos 3d internos generados con nubes de puntos de alta densidad

dc.contributor.advisorBarragan Zaque, William Benigno
dc.contributor.authorGómez Sánchez, Erika Alejandra
dc.contributor.orcidBarragán Zaque, William Benigno [0000-0001-9851-7857]
dc.creator.emailerika10037@gmail.com
dc.creator.id20211732023
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-13T22:20:43Z
dc.date.available2026-03-13T22:20:43Z
dc.date.created2025-12-09
dc.descriptionEl desarrollo y la expansión de las tecnologías de escaneo han propiciado la obtención de nubes de puntos cada vez más densas, que han permitido elaborar modelos 3D con un notable nivel de perfección. No obstante, existe que la calidad real de los modelos depende directamente de cuán fielmente los datos recuperados representan las auténticas características del mundo que se estudia. En esa línea, por tanto, resulta esencial evaluar en virtud de algo estricto, la precisión de los modelos adquiridos y comprobar cuán fieles son a la construcción del espacio físico que se desea describir. Esta monografía tiene como objetivo analizar la precisión y fiabilidad de los modelos 3D internos que se generan a partir de nubes de puntos de alta densidad. La idea es determinar su validez técnica y su relevancia en procesos operativos y de documentación espacial. Para ello, se emplean métodos estadísticos ampliamente reconocidos en la validación geométrica, como el error cuadrático medio (RMSE), la prueba t pareada, el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson y el análisis de Bland-Altman. Estas herramientas permiten cuantificar errores, identificar posibles sesgos y evaluar el nivel de concordancia entre los modelos comparados. La metodología presentada parte de la generación de modelos 3D a partir del escaneo interno, de la posterior comparación frente a referencias espaciales y de la detección de posibles discrepancias frente al entorno real. La propuesta permite no sólo la verificación de la calidad geométrica de los datos, sino que también ofrece capacidades de construir criterios de aceptación para su uso posterior. Sin embargo, el proceso presenta algunos retos, entre ellos la disponibilidad de puntos de referencia confiables, las variaciones en las condiciones de captura y la propia naturaleza técnica de los equipos utilizados. Finalmente, se espera determinar el grado de precisión de los modelos 3D evaluados y comprobar estadísticamente su concordancia con el espacio físico. Con ello, el estudio busca aportar evidencia técnica que respalde el uso de nubes de puntos de alta densidad en procesos de documentación espacial, garantizando que los modelos generados cumplan con estándares adecuados de calidad y fidelidad geométrica
dc.description.abstractThe development and expansion of scanning technologies have led to the acquisition of increasingly dense point clouds, enabling the creation of 3D models with a remarkable level of accuracy. However, the actual quality of these models depends directly on how faithfully the retrieved data represents the true characteristics of the world being studied. Therefore, it is essential to rigorously evaluate the accuracy of the acquired models and verify their fidelity to the construction of the physical space they are intended to describe. This monograph aims to analyze the accuracy and reliability of internal 3D models generated from high-density point clouds. The goal is to determine their technical validity and relevance in operational processes and spatial documentation. To this end, widely recognized statistical methods for geometric validation are employed, such as the root mean square error (RMSE), the paired t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis. These tools allow for the quantification of errors, the identification of potential biases, and the evaluation of the level of agreement between the compared models. The methodology presented begins with the generation of 3D models from internal scanning, followed by comparison against spatial references and the detection of any discrepancies with the real-world environment. This approach allows not only for the verification of the geometric quality of the data but also provides the capacity to establish acceptance criteria for subsequent use. However, the process presents some challenges, including the availability of reliable reference points, variations in capture conditions, and the inherent technical nature of the equipment used. Ultimately, the study aims to determine the degree of accuracy of the evaluated 3D models and statistically verify their correspondence with the physical space. In doing so, the study seeks to provide technical evidence supporting the use of high-density point clouds in spatial documentation processes, ensuring that the generated models meet appropriate standards of quality and geometric fidelity
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11349/100737
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas
dc.relation.referencesAckermann, F. (1999). Airborne laser scanning—present status and future expectations. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54 (2-3), 64 67.
dc.relation.referencesBarber, D., Mills, J., & Bryan, P. (2008). Towards a standard specification for terrestrial laser scanning of cultural heritage. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37(B5), 1079 1084.
dc.relation.referencesBerger, M., Tagliasacchi, A., Seversky, L. M., Alliez, P., Guennebaud, G., Levine, J. A., Sharf, A., & Silva, C. T. (2017). A survey of surface reconstruction from point clouds. Computer Graphics https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12802
dc.relation.referencesBesl, P. J., & McKay, N. D. (1992). A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(2), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791
dc.relation.referencesBoehler, W., & Marbs, A. (2004). 3D scanning and photogrammetry for heritage recording: A comparison. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Geoinformatics, 291-298.
dc.relation.referencesBoehler, W., Vicent, M. B., & Marbs, A. (2003). Investigating laser scanner accuracy. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34(5), 696-701.
dc.relation.referencesCheng, L., Chen, S., Liu, X., Xu, H., Wu, Y., Li, M., & Chen, Y. (2018). Registration of laser scanning point clouds: A review. Sensors, 18(5), 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051641
dc.relation.referencesEastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2018). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119287568
dc.relation.referencesEl-Hakim, S. F., Beraldin, J. A., & Picard, M. (2020). Advances in 3D Laser Scanning Technology. In 3D Imaging, Analysis and Applications (pp. 45-67). Springer.
dc.relation.referencesField, A. P. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5ª ed.). Sage Publications. docs.edtechhub.org+2scirp.org+2
dc.relation.referencesField, A. (2020). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Jorge, H., Riveiro, B., Vazquez-Fernandez, E., Martínez-Sánchez, J., & Arias, P. (2012). Metrological evaluation of Microsoft Kinect and Asus Xtion sensors. Measurement, 46(6), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.01.011.
dc.relation.referencesGuarnieri, A., Remondino, F., & Vettore, A. (2004). Photogrammetric and laser scanning for cultural heritage survey. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 35(B5), 6.
dc.relation.referencesGrussenmeyer, P., Kuhlmann, H., & Möller, J. (2021). Terrestrial Laser Scanning: Theory and Practice. CRC Press.
dc.relation.referencesHansen, P. C. (2010). Discrete inverse problems: Insight and algorithms. SIAM. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718836
dc.relation.referencesHübner, P., Clintworth, K., Liu, Q., Weinmann, M., & Wursthorn, S. (2020). Evaluation of HoloLens tracking and depth sensing for indoor mapping applications. Sensors, 20(4), 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041021
dc.relation.referencesKalos, M. H., & Whitlock, P. A. (2008). Monte Carlo methods. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527616840
dc.relation.referencesKazhdan, M., Bolitho, M., & Hoppe, H. (2006). Poisson surface reconstruction. Proceedings of the Fourth Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, 61 70. https://doi.org/10.2312/SGP/SGP06/061-070
dc.relation.referencesKazhdan, M., & Hoppe, H. (2013). Screened Poisson surface reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics, https://doi.org/10.1145/2487228.2487237
dc.relation.referencesKhoshelham, K., & Elberink, S. O. (2012). Accuracy and resolution of Kinect depth data indoor mapping applications. Sensors, 12(2), 1437-1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120201437
dc.relation.referencesLague, D., Brodu, N., & Leroux, J. (2013). Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z). ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 82, 10-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.009.
dc.relation.referencesLerma García, J. L., Van Genechten, B., Heine, E., & Santana Quintero, M. (2011). Theory and practice on terrestrial laser scanning: Training material based on practical applications. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
dc.relation.referencesLiu, R., Wang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Integration of Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry: A New Approach for 3D Model Creation. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 147(2), 5428.0000421 04021001
dc.relation.referencesLuhmann, T., Robson, S., Kyle, S., & Boehm, J. (2020). Close-range photogrammetry and 3D imaging https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607253 (3rd ed.). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607253
dc.relation.referencesMartín, A. G., Campoy, M. R., & Vázquez, F. E. S. (1994). Topografía básica para ingenieros (Vol. 42). EDITUM.
dc.relation.referencesMatterport. (2023). Matterport 3D Capture Technology. Recuperado de https://matterport.com/es
dc.relation.referencesMetropolis, N., & Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 44(247), 335-341
dc.relation.referencesMontgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2014). Applied statistics and probability for engineers (6ª ed.). Wiley.
dc.relation.referencesMontgomery, D. C. (2019). Design and analysis of experiments (10ª ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relation.referencesMukaka, M. M. (2012). Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 69-71.
dc.relation.referencesMyung, I. J. (2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47(1), 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00028-7
dc.relation.referencesNurunnabi, A., Belton, D., & West, G. (2012). Robust segmentation in laser scanning 3D point cloud data. 2012 International Conference on Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications (DICTA), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2012.6411672
dc.relation.referencesPrevitali, M., Barazzetti, L., Redalli, M., Scaioni, M., & Rosina, E. (2014). Rigorous procedure for mapping thermal infrared images on three-dimensional models of building façades. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 7(1), 073503. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.7.073503
dc.relation.referencesRoss, S. (2010). Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists (4ª ed.). Elsevier.
dc.relation.referencesRemondino, F., Spera, M. G., Nocerino, E., Menna, F., & Nex, F. (2014). State of the art in high density image matching. The Photogrammetric Record, 29(146), 144-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12063
dc.relation.referencesRusinkiewicz, S., & Levoy, M. (2001). Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1109/IM.2001.924423
dc.relation.referencesSoudarissanane, S., Lindenbergh, R., Menenti, M., & Teunissen, P. (2011). Scanning geometry: Influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(4), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.01.005
dc.relation.referencesTang, P., Huber, D., Akinci, B., Lipman, R., & Lytle, A. (2010). Automatic reconstruction of as-built building information models from laser-scanned point clouds: A review of related techniques. Automation in Construction, 19(7), 829-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.007
dc.relation.referencesVosselman, G., & Maas, H. G. (Eds.). (2010). Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning. Whittles Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesWehr, A., & Lohr, U. (1999). Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54 (2-3), 68-82.
dc.rights.accesoRestringido (Solo Referencia)
dc.rights.accessrightsRestrictedAccess
dc.subjectModelos 3D
dc.subjectNubes de puntos
dc.subjectAlta densidad de datos
dc.subjectPrecisión geométrica
dc.subject.keywordPoint clouds
dc.subject.keywordHigh density point clouds
dc.subject.keywordGeometric accuracy
dc.subject.keywordDigital photogrammetry
dc.subject.lembIngeniería Topográfica -- Tesis y disertaciones académicas
dc.subject.lembModelado tridimensional
dc.subject.lembNubes de puntos en fotogrametría
dc.subject.lembAnálisis de precisión en modelos digitales
dc.subject.lembReconstrucción tridimensional de espacios interiores
dc.titleAnálisis de la precisión entre modelos 3d internos generados con nubes de puntos de alta densidad
dc.title.titleenglishAnalysis of the accuracy between internal 3D models generated with high density point clouds
dc.typebachelorThesis
dc.type.degreeMonografía
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
GomezSanchezErikaAlejandra2025.pdf
Tamaño:
1,6 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
GomezSanchezErikaAlejandra2025Anexos.zip
Tamaño:
289,48 MB
Formato:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Licencia de uso y publicacion editable.pdf
Tamaño:
229,83 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
7 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: