Como Puede Un Discurso Ideologico Influir En La Preparacion Del Personaje

Abstract

What the reader will find in the following reflexive text is the problem of how ideological discourse has very complex implications for character traits and,

1 In this sense, the first questioning can be understood as an invitation to reread and reinterpret the work that had already been developed during 25 years as an actress, and that now took new records of understanding; the second one raised me the possible uses I could make with these new acquired knowledge, in relation to my profession. That is to say, the two questions that seem to be close are nevertheless different insofar as they first invited me to reflect and then to make use of these new knowledge.

2 The term Ideology is taken here as a system of ideas that constitutes a specific discourse; on which a person or several can agree and defend this system at the level of culture, or politics. In the Rae for example, the term ideology is defined as follows: set of fundamental ideas that characterizes the thinking of a person, collectivity or era, a cultural movement, political religious, etc. In this sense, ideological discourses refer to the content of that system of ideas and the articulation of meaning that they imply in the field of the public.

More interesting, you will find the implications of these characters when building the character. To carry out this, I have provided three sections that attempt to weave an explanation of the complexity existing in the construction of the character. In the first, an interpretation and an analysis of the discourse expressed with the character of the Bride and Alice is exposed, there the characters' ideological characteristics will be made explicit; in the second I analyze the thoughts of both Stanislavski and Chekhov, to explain with these two different ideas of character preparation, how the ideological characters of the characters can have different modes of expression through the body, gestures, movement, etc. Finally through some interpretative precisions that are derived from having traveled this way, I argue that despite the differences, the two authors agree that the details of the character are constituted by discursive elements; The purpose of this path is to make visible not only the ideological discourse in the characters of the work, but what this