Comparison of four methods of visual risk tree assessment in urban areas
| dc.contributor.author | Ponce-Donoso, Mauricio | spa |
| dc.contributor.author | Vallejos-Barra, Óscar | spa |
| dc.contributor.author | Reyes de la Barra, Jorge | spa |
| dc.contributor.author | Daniluk-Mosquera, Gustavo | spa |
| dc.contributor.author | Coelho Duarte, Ana Paula | spa |
| dc.date | 2018-07-01 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-19T21:19:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-09-19T21:19:42Z | |
| dc.description | Four methods of visual risk tree assessment were applied in 30 urban trees with different risk levels, in Talca city (Chile). The methods used were: “Avaliação de árvores de risco na arborização de vias públicas de Nova Olímpia” (Sampaio Method), “International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Matheny & Clark” (Method ISA[A]), “Best Management Practice BMP/ISA” (Method ISA[B]) and “Urban tree risk management USDA Forest Service” (Method USF). The results were standardized for statistical analysis, finding significant differences and variations between the methods, after applying the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Duncan test. Three groups were formed; the Sampaio and USF methods, which presented very high and high risk assessments, respectively; the second one was conformed by USF and ISA (A), which presented high to medium risk assessments; while the third group was shaped by ISA (B) with low risk assessments. Since the Talca city does not have its own methodology, it is suggested that the ISA (A) or USF method could be used in the Mediterranean area of Chile, because they were the methods presenting the best adaptation to local conditions. | en-US |
| dc.description | Cuatro métodos de evaluación visual del riesgo se aplicaron en 30 árboles urbanos con niveles de riesgo en la ciudad de Talca (Chile). Los métodos utilizados fueron: “Avaliação de árvores de risco na arborização de vias públicas de Nova Olímpia” (método Sampaio), “Internation Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Matheny y Clark” (método ISA[A]), “Best Management Practice BMP/ISA” (método ISA[B]) y “Urban tree risk management USDA Forest Service” (método USF). Los resultados fueron estandarizados para su análisis estadístico, se encontraron diferencias significativas y variaciones en los métodos al aplicar el test no paramétrico de Kruskal-Wallis y de Duncan. Se conformaron tres grupos: los métodos Sampaio y USF, que presentaron evaluaciones con riesgo muy alto y alto, respectivamente; el segundo, conformado por USF e ISA(A), presentó evaluaciones de alto a medio riesgo; mientras que un tercer grupo lo conformó ISA(B), con evaluaciones de riesgo bajo. Ya que la ciudad de Talca no cuenta con una metodología propia, se sugiere usar en el área mediterránea de Chile el método ISA(A) o USF, ya que fueron los métodos que presentaron una mejor adecuación a las condiciones locales. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.format | application/xml | |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/view/12604 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.14483/2256201X.12604 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11349/17937 | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/view/12604/13950 | |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/view/12604/14170 | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2018 Colombia forestal | es-ES |
| dc.source | Colombia Forestal; Vol 21 No 2 (2018): Julio-Diciembre; 161-173 | en-US |
| dc.source | Colombia forestal; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2018): Julio-Diciembre; 161-173 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 2256-201X | |
| dc.source | 0120-0739 | |
| dc.subject | urban trees | en-US |
| dc.subject | arboriculture | en-US |
| dc.subject | urban tree risk | en-US |
| dc.subject | urban forestry | en-US |
| dc.subject | arbolado urbano | es-ES |
| dc.subject | arboricultura | es-ES |
| dc.subject | riesgo del árbol urbano | es-ES |
| dc.subject | silvicultura urbana | es-ES |
| dc.title | Comparison of four methods of visual risk tree assessment in urban areas | en-US |
| dc.title | Comparación de cuatro métodos de evaluación visual del riesgo de árboles urbanos | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |