Posiciones y posicionamientos de los profesores de Inglés hacia los alumnos con diversidad funcional: un estudio narrativo
| dc.contributor.advisor | Aldana Gutierrez, Yeraldine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barrero Rico, Cristhian Camilo | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Aldana Gutierrez, Yeraldine [0000-0001-6655-2041] | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-26T17:41:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-26T17:41:07Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2024-10-11 | |
| dc.description | Este estudio ha abordado y cuestionado los discursos y prácticas en torno a los derechos humanos, las políticas inclusivas y las normas que apoyan una visión positivista y basada en el déficit de los estudiantes con discapacidad en su educación EFL, influyendo en las prácticas pedagógicas, la realidad social y la toma de decisiones de los profesores de inglés. Esta investigación parte de un marco interpretativo crítico de la discapacidad. En este estudio, se identificaron tres constructos principales: representación(es) deficitaria(s) basada(s) en los derechos humanos, discurso(s) político(s) de la discapacidad, y posiciones y posicionamientos de los profesores de inglés. Estos constructos resaltan la terminología y comprensión difusa de la educación inclusiva; así mismo, las condiciones discursivamente políticas bajo las cuales se legitiman los estudiantes con diversidad funcional, y las múltiples posiciones y posicionamientos de los profesores de inglés. Los participantes fueron docentes colombianos de inglés en servicio, quienes fueron beneficiarios, informantes, participantes y co-interpretadores de la presente investigación. Los datos se recogieron mediante narraciones escritas y entrevistas semiestructuradas. Los resultados sugieren que los profesores normalizan y simultáneamente desnaturalizan las representaciones deficitarias a través de modelos de derechos humanos (es decir, modelos sociales, médicos y morales) que reproducen las imágenes occidentales de la discapacidad. Estas imágenes se materializan a través de un lenguaje positivista y neoliberal promulgado por normas y políticas normalizadoras. Traducción realizada con la versión gratuita del traductor DeepL.com | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study has addressed and challenged the discourses and practices surrounding human rights, inclusive policies, and norms that support a positivist and the deficit-based view of students with disabilities in their EFL education, influencing the pedagogical practices, social reality, and decision making of English language teachers. This research departs from a critical disability interpretative framework. In this study, three main constructs were identified: human rights-based deficitarian representation(s), political disability discourse(s), and English language teachers’ positions and positionings. These constructs highlight the diffuse terminology and understanding of inclusive education; likewise, the discursively political conditions under students with functional diversity are legitimized, and the multiple positions and positionings of English language teachers. The participants were Colombian English language teachers-in-service who were beneficiaries, informants, participants, and co-interpreters of the present inquiry. The data were collected through written narratives, and semi-structured interviews. The findings suggest that teachers normalize and simultaneously denaturalize deficitarian representations through human rights models (i.e., social, medical, and moral models) that reproduce Western images of disabilities. Those images are materialized through positivist and neoliberal language enacted by standardizing norms and policies. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | ||
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11349/92965 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.references | Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (2010). Self-identity and self-categorization. In J. Dovidio., M. Hewstone., P. Glick., M. Esses (Eds.), The sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 527-543). Sage Publication. | |
| dc.relation.references | Aldana, Y. (2022). In the Path of Creating a Relational “How” in Research: From Instrumentalization to Re-Humanization. Methodological Innovations in Research and Academic Writing, pp. 120-142. IGI Publishing. | |
| dc.relation.references | Aldana, Y. (2024). Amplifying English Language Teachers’ in-betweenness of their experiences in peace construction. Ñemityra, 6(1), 85-102. | |
| dc.relation.references | Aspis, S. (2013). Inclusive education, politics and the struggle for change. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability, politics and the struggle for change (pp. 111-125). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2014). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. Routledge. | |
| dc.relation.references | Alcaldia Mayor de Bogotá. (2021). Diagnostico local de Engativa. Retrieved from May 17, 2023, from https://www.integracionsocial.gov.co/images/_docs/entidad/10_Diagnostico_local_Engativa_2021_VF.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Barkhuizen, G. (2008). A narrative approach to exploring context in language teaching. ELT Journal, 62(3), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm043. | |
| dc.relation.references | Barden, O., & Walden, S, J. (2021). The metanarrative of learning disability. In D. Bolt (Ed.), Metanarratives of disability culture, assumed authority, and the normative social order (pp. 77-93). Routledge. | |
| dc.relation.references | Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination. Hurst & Company, London. | |
| dc.relation.references | Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2001). Disability culture: Assimilation or inclusion? In G. Albrecht., K. Seelman., & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disabilities studies (pp. 515-534). Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Bedoin, D. (2011). English teachers of deaf and hard‐of‐hearing students in French schools: Needs, barriers, and strategies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(2), 159-175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2011.563605 | |
| dc.relation.references | Benesch, S. (2012). Considering emotions in critical English language teaching. Routledge. | |
| dc.relation.references | Bygrave, C., Asik-Dizdar, O., & Kaur, G. (2014). From homogeneity to heterogeneity: The multicultural future of higher education. On the Horizon, 22(3), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-05-2014-0016 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bonilla, S., & Samaca, Y. (2023). Unauthorized outlooks on second languages education and policies voices from Colombia. In C. Guerrero (Ed.), Disobedient ELT research: Breaking the rules, finding alternatives, invoking other ontologies (pp. 15-29). Palgrave MacMillan. | |
| dc.relation.references | Clark, M. (2008). The discursive construction of system of knowledge and belief. In V. Edwards (Ed.), Language teacher identities co-constructing discourse and community (pp. 105-135). Multilingual Matters. | |
| dc.relation.references | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory, a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Charmaz, K., & Bryant, A. (2007). The sage handbook of grounded theory. Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, M. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge. | |
| dc.relation.references | Cole, B. A. (2010). ‘Good faith and effort?’ Perspectives on educational inclusion. Disability & Society, 20(3), 331-344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590500060794 | |
| dc.relation.references | Constitución política de Colombia. (1991). Articulo 67. Retrieved December 19, 2022. https://www.constitucioncolombia.com/titulo-2/capitulo-2/articulo-67 | |
| dc.relation.references | Constitución política de Colombia. (1994). Educational law. Article 67. Retrieved October 10, 2022. https://constituciondecolombia.com.co/cpcart67.html#:~:text=ARTICULO%2067%C2%BA.,y%20valores%20de%20la%20cultura. | |
| dc.relation.references | Coulthard, M. (1985). An introduction to discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Longman Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches (3rd ed). Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson. | |
| dc.relation.references | Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Dawn, R. (2021). The social model of disability in India politics of identity and power. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x. | |
| dc.relation.references | Denzin, N, K., & Lincoln, Y, S. (2018). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Deppermann, A. (2015). Positioning. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 369–387). Wiley. | |
| dc.relation.references | De Sousa, B. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the south. Duke University. | |
| dc.relation.references | Doyle, S. (2007). Member checking with older women: A framework for negotiating meaning. Health Care for Women International, 8, 888-908. | |
| dc.relation.references | Eagleton, T. (2007). Ideology. Cambridge University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Eickers, G. (2024). Pathologizing disabled and trans identities: How emotions become marginalized. In S. Lynn (Ed.), The Bloomsbury guide to philosophy of disability (pp. 361-376). Bloomsbury Academic. | |
| dc.relation.references | Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research. Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Evans, N. J., Broido, E. M., Brown, K. R., & Wilke, A. (2017). Disability in higher education: A social justice approach. Jossey-Bass. | |
| dc.relation.references | Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis a method for advanced students. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse textual analysis for social research. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Fenton, Z. (2016). Disability does not discriminate toward a theory of multiple identity through coalition. In D. Connor., B. Ferri., S. Annamma (Eds.), Disability studies and critical race theory in education (pp.527-543). Teachers Collage Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). (R, Hurley, Trans.). New York: Random House. | |
| dc.relation.references | Foucault, M. (1985). The use of the pleasure (Vol. 2). (R, Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon. | |
| dc.relation.references | Gaertner, L., Dovidio, J., & Houlette, M. (2010). Social categorization. In J. Dovidio., M. Hewstone., P. Glick., & M. Esses (Eds.), The sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 527-543). Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Grech, S. (2011). Recolonising debates or perpetuated coloniality? Decentring the spaces of disability, development and community in the global South. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2010.496198 | |
| dc.relation.references | Harre, R. (2012). Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 191-206). | |
| dc.relation.references | Harre, R., & Davies, B. (1990). Positioning: The discursive of selves. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43-63. | |
| dc.relation.references | Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. (2015). Positioning theory and social representations. In G. Sammut., E. Andreouli., G. Gaskell., & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 224-233). Cambridge University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Harré, R., Moghaddam, F. M., Cairnie, T. P., Rothbart, D., & Sabat, S. R. (2009). Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308101417 | |
| dc.relation.references | Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Kaldonek-Crnjakovic´, A., & Fiser, Z. (2021). Teacher positioning and students with dyslexia: Voices of Croatian EFL teachers. Journal of Language & Education, 7(3), 76-88. | |
| dc.relation.references | Kayi-Aydar, H. (2019). Positioning theory in applied linguistics research design and applications. Palgrave Macmillan. | |
| dc.relation.references | Kincheloe, J. (2008). Knowledge and critical pedagogy. Springer. | |
| dc.relation.references | Lajoie, C. (2024). Returning to institutional language through a phenomenological lens. In S. Lynn (Ed.), The Bloomsbury guide to philosophy of disability (pp. 271-291). Bloomsbury Academic. | |
| dc.relation.references | Liasidou, A. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and inclusive educational policies: The power to exclude. Journal of Education Policy, 23(5), 483-500. | |
| dc.relation.references | Llewellyn, A., & Hogan, K. (2000). The use and abuse of models of disability. Disability & Society, 15(1), 157–165. | |
| dc.relation.references | M.E.N. (2013). Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Resolución 2565 del 2013. Retrieved March 19, 2023. | |
| dc.relation.references | M.E.N. (2017). Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Atención educativa a personas con discapacidad en el marco de educación inclusiva. Retrieved November 18, 2023. | |
| dc.relation.references | M.E.N. (2021). Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Lineamientos de política para la inclusión y la equidad en educación. Retrieved October 10, 2022. | |
| dc.relation.references | Mallett, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Approaching disability critical issues and perspectives. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Marks, D. (1997). Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(3), 85–91. | |
| dc.relation.references | Merriam, S, B., Tisdell, J. E. (2016). Qualitative research a guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass. | |
| dc.relation.references | McColl, M., James, A., Boyce, W., & Shortt., S. (2006). Disability policy making: Evaluating the evidence base. In D. Pothier & R. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory (pp. 26-43). UBCPress. | |
| dc.relation.references | McLaren., Peter, L., & Giarelli, J. (1995). Critical theory and educational research. New York Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2017). Decreto 1421 del 2017. Retrieved from May 13, 2023. | |
| dc.relation.references | Mitchell, D., & Snyder, S. (2015). The biopolitics od disability neoliberalism, ablenationalism, and pheripheral embodiment. Michigan Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Moghaddam, F. M., Harré, R., & Lee, N. (2008). Positioning and conflict: An introduction. In F. M. Moghaddam, R. Harré, & N. Lee (Eds.), Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis (pp. 3–20). Springer Science + Business Media. | |
| dc.relation.references | Morse, J. (1991). Approach to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120-123 | |
| dc.relation.references | Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan, Basingstoke. | |
| dc.relation.references | Olkin, R. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disability. Guilford Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Pavlenko, A., & Blackledge, A. (2004). Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. London: Multilingual Matters. | |
| dc.relation.references | Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (pp.169-186). Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Quinn, D., Kallen, W., & Spencer, S. (2010). Stereotype treat. In J. Dovidio., M. Hewstone., P. Glick., M. Esses (Eds.), The sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp.380-394). Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Quintero, A. H, & Guerrero, C. H. (2018). The (re)construction of self through student-teachers´ storied agency in ELT: Between marginalization and idealization. In B. Yazan & N. Rudolph (Eds). Criticality, teacher identity, and (In)equity in English language teaching. Educational Linguistics. | |
| dc.relation.references | Quintero, A. H, Duarte, C, & León, A. (2022). Identity as a source of agency for transformative English language teachers. Educación y Humanismo, 24(43), 110-128. | |
| dc.relation.references | Riddell, S., & Watson, N. (2014). Disability, culture and identity. Routledge. | |
| dc.relation.references | Rioux, M., & Valentine, F. (2006). Does theory matter? Exploring the nexus between disability, human rights, and public policy. In D. Pothier & R. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory (pp.48-69). UBCPress. | |
| dc.relation.references | Romañach, J., & Palacios, A. (2008). El modelo de la diversidad: Una visión de la bioética desde la perspectiva de las personas con diversidad funcional (discapacidad). Intersticios, 2(2),37-47. | |
| dc.relation.references | Secretaria de Bogotá. (2018).Lineamiento de política de educación inclusiva. Retrieved from September 21, 2024. | |
| dc.relation.references | Series, L. (2020). Disability and human rights. In N. Watson., S. Vehmas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 72-88). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Shakespeare, T. (2018). Disabilitiy the basics: Education for all. Routledge. | |
| dc.relation.references | Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2005). Inclusive education for exclusive pupils a critical analysis of the government of the exceptional. In S. Lynn (Ed.), Foucault and the government of disability (pp. 208-225). Michigan Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Shildrick, M. (2012). Critical disability studies: Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In N. Watson., A. Roulstone., & S. Vehmas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 72-88). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. University of Michigan Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Smooth, W. G. (2013). Intersectionality from theoretical framework to policy intervention. In A. R. Wilson (Eds.), Situating intersectionality politics, policy, and power (pp. 11-41). Palgrave Macmillan. | |
| dc.relation.references | Spencer, B., & Castano, E. (2007). Social class is dead. Long live social class! Stereotyping threat among low socioeconomic status individuals. Social justice research, 20(4), 418-432. | |
| dc.relation.references | Terry. D., & Hogg, M. (2000). Attitudes, behaviors, and social context: The role of norms and group membership applied social research. Lawrence ERLBAUM associates. | |
| dc.relation.references | Thomas, G & Laxley, A. (2007). Deconstructing and constructing inclusion. Open University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Tremain, S. (2005). Foucault, governmentality, and critical disability theory. University of Michigan Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Tyjewski. C. (2006). Ghost in the machine: Civil rights laws and hybrid “invisible other”. In D. Pothier & R. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory (pp.107-125). UBCPress. | |
| dc.relation.references | UNESCO. (1994). Declaración de Salamanca y Marco de Acción para las Necesidades Educativas Especiales. Salamanca España. Retrieved from October 10, 2022 | |
| dc.relation.references | UNESCO. (2016). Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal. Retrieved from October 10, 2022. | |
| dc.relation.references | United Nations (1990). World declaration on education for all. Retrieved December 19, 2022. https://www.ohchr.org/en/resources/educators/human-rights-education-training/9-world-declaration-education-all-1990#:~:text=Every%20person%20%2D%20child%2C%20youth%20and,meet%20their%20basic%20learning%20needs. | |
| dc.relation.references | United Nations. (2015). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved December 19, 2022. https://www.un.org/en/udhrbook/pdf/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Van Langenhove, L., & Harre, R. (2019). Introducing positioning theory. In H. Kayi-Aydar (Ed.), Positioning theory in applied linguistics research design & applications (pp.15-3). Palgrave Macmillan. | |
| dc.relation.references | Vlachou-Balafouti, A. (2013). The process of change and the politics of resistance in educational contexts: the case of disability. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability, politics & the struggle for change (pp. 111-125). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. | |
| dc.relation.references | Wagner, W. (2015). Representation in Action. In G. Sammut., E. Andreouli., G. Gaskell., & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 12-28). Cambridge University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Wagner, W., Kello, K., & Rammer, A. (2018). Making social objects: The theory of social representation. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook sociocultural psychology (pp. 130-147). Cambridge University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Waldschmidt, A. (2005). Who is normal? Who is deviant? “Normality” and “risk” in genetic diagnostics and counseling. In S. Lynn (Ed.), Foucault and the government of disability (pp. 191-207). Michigan Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Woodward, K. (1997). Concepts of identity and difference. In Woodward, K. (Ed.) Identity and difference (pp.7-62). Sage Publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | World Health Organization. (1976). Classification of impairment. In W. H. Organization, International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease (p. 207). World Health Assembly. | |
| dc.relation.references | Yin, R. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Wagner, W. (2015). Representation in action. In G. Sammut., E. Andreouli., G. Gaskell., & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp.12-28). Cambridge University Press. | |
| dc.rights.acceso | Restringido (Solo Referencia) | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | RestrictedAccess | |
| dc.subject | Narrativas | |
| dc.subject | Posiciones y posicionamientos de los profesores de Inglés | |
| dc.subject | Diversidad funcional | |
| dc.subject | Derechos Humanos | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Narratives | |
| dc.subject.keyword | English language teachers’ positions and positionings | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Functional diversity | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Human Rights | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Maestría en Linguística -- Tesis y disertaciones académicas | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Educación especial | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Estudiantes con discapacidades | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Política educativa | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Inglés -Enseñanza -Método bilingüe | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Profesores | |
| dc.title | Posiciones y posicionamientos de los profesores de Inglés hacia los alumnos con diversidad funcional: un estudio narrativo | |
| dc.title.titleenglish | English language teachers’ positions and positionings toward functionally diverse students: u narrative study | |
| dc.type | masterThesis | |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc | |
| dc.type.degree | Investigación-Innovación | |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Archivos
Bloque de licencias
1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 7 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción:
