Involucramiento de los estudiantes de grado décimo con literacidades locales mediante relacionalidades alternativas en tunjuelito

dc.contributor.advisorSierra Gordillo, Javier Armando
dc.contributor.authorFuquen Camen, Sonia Astrid
dc.contributor.orcidJavier Armando Sierra Gordillo [0000-0002-0269-0338]
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-13T17:33:56Z
dc.date.available2026-02-13T17:33:56Z
dc.date.created2025-10-24
dc.descriptionEste estudio cualitativo, basado en una metodología descriptiva e interpretativa, explora las reflexiones co-construidas por estudiantes de décimo grado de una institución educativa pública mientras participaron en una indagación sobre literacidades locales enmarcada en relacionalidades alternativas en Tunjuelito (Bogotá). La investigación cuestiona los enfoques instrumentales tradicionales de la enseñanza del inglés —centrados en la gramática, el vocabulario y la corrección estructural— al incorporar dimensiones socioculturales, emocionales y críticas que confrontan narrativas de déficit, estigma y marginación. A partir de conceptos como la lectura del mundo, la pedagogía crítica y las literacidades locales entendidas como prácticas culturalmente situadas, el estudio utilizó la teoría fundamentada para analizar los datos recolectados en artefactos estudiantiles, entrevistas semiestructuradas y grupos de discusión. El análisis identificó el conocimiento local como categoría central, sustentada en tres subcategorías que configuraron la construcción crítica del aprendizaje del idioma por parte de los estudiantes. Los hallazgos revelan que los estudiantes desarrollaron reflexiones complejas marcadas por dualidades —como belleza y adversidad— y ambivalencias afectivas. Sus voces demostraron la capacidad de replantear estereotipos, confrontar la injusticia y ejercer resistencia. El proceso fomentó un fuerte sentido de pertenencia, identidad comunitaria y conciencia crítica, resaltando el valor de las pedagogías humanizantes en la enseñanza del inglés. Este estudio destaca la importancia de involucrar a los estudiantes en un aprendizaje reflexivo arraigado en sus experiencias de vida. Contribuye a la educación lingüística crítica al valorar el conocimiento local como herramienta para cuestionar narrativas dominantes. A través de una pedagogía situada en el territorio, los estudiantes fueron empoderados para convertirse en agentes activos de transformación, utilizando sus voces y reflexiones para imaginar futuros alternativos. De esta manera, el aula de inglés emerge como un espacio de indagación social y cambio, donde los estudiantes leen su mundo y otorgan nuevos significados al aprendizaje del lenguaje. Al leer su mundo, los estudiantes aprendieron no solo un idioma, sino formas alternativas de nombrar y transformar sus realidades.
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative study, grounded in a descriptive and interpretive methodology, explores the reflections co-constructed by tenth-grade students from a public school as they engaged in a local literacy inquiry framed by alternative relationalities in Tunjuelito (in Bogotá). It challenges traditional instrumental approaches to English language teaching—focused on grammar, vocabulary, and structural correctness—by incorporating sociocultural, emotional, and critical dimensions that confront deficit narratives, stigma, and marginalization. Drawing from concepts such as reading the world, critical pedagogy, and local literacies as culturally situated practices, the research used grounded theory to analyze data collected from students’ artifacts, semi-structured interviews, and discussion groups. The analysis identified local knowledge as the central category, supported by three subcategories that shaped students’ construction of critical language learning. Findings reveal that students developed complex reflections marked by dualities—such as beauty and adversity—and affective ambivalences. Their voices demonstrated the ability to reframe stereotypes, confront injustice, and enact resistance. The process fostered a strong sense of belonging, community identity, and critical awareness, underscoring the value of humanizing pedagogies in English language education. This study highlights the importance of engaging students in reflective learning rooted in their lived experiences. It contributes to critical language education by valuing local knowledge as a tool for questioning dominant narratives. Through place-based pedagogy, students were empowered to become active agents of transformation, using their voices and reflections to imagine alternative futures. In doing so, the English classroom emerges as a space for social inquiry and change, where students read their world and assign new meaning to language learning. In reading their world, students learned not only a language, but alternative ways of naming and transforming their realities.
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11349/100385
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
dc.relation.referencesAcosta, A. (2021). Local literacies and English teaching: A decolonial perspective [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas].
dc.relation.referencesApple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18(1), 12–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803260022
dc.relation.referencesBarrett, M. (2013). Interculturalism and multiculturalism: Similarities and differences. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesBarton, D. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesBarton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesBravíssimo. (2021, March 9). A la localidad de Tunjuelito [Television broadcast]. Citytv.
dc.relation.referencesBrinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesBryant, S. A. (2005). In Consideration of Latino Children: a sociocultural perspective of literacy skills development using Literature Circles. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal. no.7. Bogotá. ISSN 0123-4641
dc.relation.referencesCanagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.relation.referencesCanagarajah, A. S. (2013). Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203120293
dc.relation.referencesCastañeda. G. D. (2018). Exploring local literacies with EFL students through blog interactions. [Master thesis: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas]. Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesCarr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1988). Teoría crítica de la enseñanza: La investigación-acción en la formación del profesorado [Traducción del inglés]. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.
dc.relation.referencesChall (1967). Learning to Read: The Great Debate. New York: McGraw-Hill. 6. Clay, M.M.
dc.relation.referencesCharmaz, K. (2006). Construcción de la teoría fundamentada: Una guía práctica para el análisis cualitativo. Londres: Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesCendales, Mejía, M., L., & Muñoz, J. (2016). Pedagogías y metodologías de la educación popular: “Se hace camino al andar”. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones Desde Abajo.
dc.relation.referencesClavijo-Olarte, A. (2013). “Implementing Community-Based Pedagogies with Teachers in Colombia to Enhance the EFL Curriculum.” aclavijo.files.wordpress.com
dc.relation.referencesClavijo-Olarte, A. & Sharkey, J. (2012). Community-based pedagogies: Projects and possibilities in Colombia and the US. In A. Honigsfeld & A. Cohen (Eds.), Breaking the Mold of Education for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students (pp. 129–138). Rowman & Littlefield.Sage Journals+2ResearchGate+2Sage Journals+2
dc.relation.referencesClavijo Olarte, A. (2016). Teachers as learners: Building communities of practice for critical literacies. Bogotá: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
dc.relation.referencesClavijo-Olarte, A. & Ramírez, L. M. (2019). “Las Pedagogías de la Comunidad a través de Investigaciones Locales en el Contexto Urbano de Bogotá.” Amparo Clavijo Olarte, Ph.D+2ERIC+2aclavijo.files.wordpress.com+2
dc.relation.referencesClavijo-Olarte, A. (2021). Language and literacy practices in teacher education: Contributions from a local agenda. HOW – Revista de Lenguaje y Literatura, 28(3), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.28.3.680
dc.relation.referencesClavijo-Olarte, A., Medina, R. A., Calderón, D., Rodríguez, A., Prieto, K., & Náder, M. C. (2023). “Raising Awareness of the City as a Text: Multimodal, Multicultural, and Multilingual Resources for Education.”. In A. Salmon & A. Clavijo-Olarte (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Socio-Cultural and Linguistic Perspectives on Language and Literacy Development. IGI Global.ResearchGate+2Amparo Clavijo Olarte, Ph.D+2Amparo Clavijo Olarte, Ph.D+2
dc.relation.referencesCoetzee, F. (2012). Local and translocal literacies in an urban ‘village’ – a sociolinguistic study. [Master Thesis: University of Cape Town]. South Africa. UCT.
dc.relation.referencesCollins, J. (2007). Reading Shop Windows in Globalized Neighborhoods: Multilingual Literacy Practices and Indexicality. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(3). DOI:10.1080/10862960701613128
dc.relation.referencesComber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621042000257225
dc.relation.referencesComber, B. (2015). Critical literacies and social justice. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy. 58(5). p. 362-367. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/74883/
dc.relation.referencesComber, B. (2016). Literacy, place and pedagogies of possibility.
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República de Colombia. (1994). Ley 115 de 1994. Por la cual se expide la ley general de educación. Diario Oficial 41.214, 8 de febrero de 1994. Recuperado de https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=292.
dc.relation.referencesCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J., & Miller, D. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
dc.relation.referencesCrocker, J. (2009). “Locus of Enunciation: Insights for Intercultural Language Teaching". Published in the ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) database.
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesDurán, M. (2020). Engaging students in critical literacies through local inquiry: A pedagogical experience in Bogotá (Master’s thesis). Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
dc.relation.referencesEvans, W., & Savage, J. (2015). Developing a local curriculum: Using your locality to inspire teaching and learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880384
dc.relation.referencesForero-Mondragón, A. J., & Quintero-Polo, Á. H. (2022). Disciplinary power lying behind the requisite of English language mastery in international scholarships. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 24(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v24n1.91112
dc.relation.referencesFerreiro, E. (1986). Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo del niño. Siglo XXI Editores.
dc.relation.referencesFerreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1983). Literacy before schooling. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
dc.relation.referencesFinlay, L. (2005). "Reflexive embodied empathy": A phenomenology of participant-researcher intersubjectivity. The Humanistic Psychologist, 33(4), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15473333thp3304_4
dc.relation.referencesFreire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
dc.relation.referencesFreire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986103
dc.relation.referencesFreire, P. (1983). The politics of education: Culture, power and liberation. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
dc.relation.referencesFreire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage. P. 29. Rowman & Littlefield.
dc.relation.referencesFreire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
dc.relation.referencesFusch, P., & Ness, L. (2015). Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Report, 20, 1408-1416. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss9/3
dc.relation.referencesGardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
dc.relation.referencesGee, J. P. (1996). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourse. London: Taylor and Francis.
dc.relation.referencesGiroux, Henry (1994a) «Doing Cultural Studies: Youth and the Challenge of Pedagogy». Harvard Educational Reviev. 64 (3). p. 278-308.
dc.relation.referencesGiroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Bergin & Garvey.
dc.relation.referencesGiroux, H. A. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesGiroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
dc.relation.referencesGlaser, B. y Strauss, A. (1967). El descubrimiento de la teoría fundamentada: Estrategias para la investigación cualitativa. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
dc.relation.referencesGómez Gutiérrez, A. J. (2018). Collaborative inquiry in the EFL classroom: exploring a school-related topic with fifth graders. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 20(2), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.13008
dc.relation.referencesGoodman, K. S. (1996). On reading. Heinemann.
dc.relation.referencesGruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004003
dc.relation.referencesGuajardo, M.A., Guajardo, F., Janson, C., & Militello, M. (2016). Reframing Community Partnerships in Education: Uniting the Power of Place and Wisdom of People. New York, NY, Routledge, 198 pp, ISBN: 1317555600, 9781317555605
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero Nieto, C. H. (2013). “Of being and not being”: Colombian public elementary school teachers’ oscillating identities. HOW, 20(1), 190–205.
dc.relation.referencesHabermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
dc.relation.referencesHeigham, J., & Croker, R. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesHooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Distrital de Patrimonio Cultural. (13 de febrero de 2022). Voces del Patrimonio – Tunjuelito [Archivo de Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tki4A6W4skI
dc.relation.referencesKerka, S. (2003). Community asset mapping: Trends and issues alert. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. 7, 1–2.
dc.relation.referencesKincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. L. (1994). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138–157). Sage Publications, Inc.
dc.relation.referencesKinloch, V. (2011). Harlem on our minds: Place, race, and the literacies of urban youth. Teachers College Press.
dc.relation.referencesKohler. M. (2015). Teachers as Mediators in the Foreign Language Classroom. University of South Australia. DOI:10.21832/9781783093076
dc.relation.referencesKumaravadivelu, B. (2003) Beyond Method: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. Yale University Press, New York.
dc.relation.referencesKumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding Language Teaching. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesLastra, N. (2019). Promoting local literacies through community-based projects in EFL classrooms [Master’s thesis, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas].
dc.relation.referencesLefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1974).
dc.relation.referencesLuke, D.A. (2004) Multilevel Modeling. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985147
dc.relation.referencesMcCarty, T. L. (Ed.). (2005). Language, literacy, and power in schooling (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613547
dc.relation.referencesMcConnell, M., et al. (2020). International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00255-y
dc.relation.referencesMcLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
dc.relation.referencesMerriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis, 1(1), 1-17.
dc.relation.referencesMignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2004). Programa Nacional de Bilingüismo: Colombia 2004–2019. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Educación Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2014). Programa Nacional de Inglés 2015–2025: Colombia Very Well! Documento de socialización. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Educación Nacional. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-343837_Programa_Nacional_Ingles.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas extranjeras: Inglés. Bogotá, Colombia: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesMoll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 132-141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534
dc.relation.referencesMonk, J. (2017). Walking the streets of London: using Zadie Smith's ‘NW’ to explore teenage, metropolitan ways of seeing and writing. Research journal of the national association for the teaching of English. 51(2). p. 188-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12142
dc.relation.referencesMora, R. A. (2012). Literacidad y el aprendizaje de lenguas: nuevas formas de entender los mundos y las palabras de nuestros estudiantes. Revista Internacional Magisterio, (58), 52-56
dc.relation.referencesMora, R. A., Pulgarín, C., Ramírez, N., & Mejía-Vélez, M. C. (2018). English literacies in Medellín: The city as literacy. In S. Nichols & S. Dobson (Eds.), Learning cities: Multimodal explorations and placed pedagogies (Vol. 8, pp. 37–60). Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8100-2_4
dc.relation.referencesMorgan, D.L. (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984287
dc.relation.referencesMurillo, J. (2009). Retos en la evaluación de la calidad de la educación en América Latina. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 50(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie530559
dc.relation.referencesNieto, S. (2010). The Light in Their Eyes: Creating Multicultural Learning Communities.
dc.relation.referencesNieto, Y. A. (2019). Promoting the Use of Local Literacies among EFL University Teachers: Sources to Connect Curriculum and Teaching. [Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas]. http://hdl.handle.net/11349/15393
dc.relation.referencesNoddings, N. (2005) The Challenge to Care in Schools. Teachers College Press, New York.
dc.relation.referencesNorton, B., & Toohey, K. (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesObservatorio de Mujeres y Equidad de Género de Bogotá (OMEG). (2024, enero 15). Diagnósticos locales: Tunjuelito (2023). Secretaría Distrital de Planeación.
dc.relation.referencesPatton, M. (2000). Qualitative Research and evaluation methods. Porto.
dc.relation.referencesPavlenko, E. S. (2016). “Adult” as a Concept for Young People Building Their Life Course. Russian Education & Society, 58, 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2016.1242990
dc.relation.referencesPedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003.
dc.relation.referencesPennycook. A. (2010). Language as a Local Practice. New York. USA: Routedgle.
dc.relation.referencesPhillipson, R. (1992). Imperialismo lingüístico. Oxford, Inglaterra: Oxford University Press
dc.relation.referencesPratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 1991(1), 33–40.
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, L. M. (2006). School literacy practices closer to home: the new challenge of literacy learning. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (8), 216–227.
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, L. M., & Olarte Clavijo, A. (2023). Decolonizing ELT teacher education by incorporating knowledge of local communities in the teaching practicum. F1000Research, 12, 1264. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133704.1
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, A., & Guerrero, C. (2013). Of being and not being: Colombian public elementary school teachers’ representations of their English language teaching. HOW Journal, 20(1), 156–174.
dc.relation.referencesRallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, C. (2019, junio 14). Resumen. Normas APA (7.ª edición). https://normas-apa.org/estructura/resumen/
dc.relation.referencesSayer, P. (2010). Using the linguistic landscape as a pedagogical resource. ELT Journal, 64(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp051
dc.relation.referencesSecretaría Distrital de Integración Social. (2018). Integración en acción – Tunjuelito. Bogotá, Colombia: Secretaría Distrital de Integración Social.
dc.relation.referencesSecretaría Distrital de Integración Social. (2006). Diagnóstico local con participación social. Bogotá, Colombia: Secretaría Distrital de Integración Social.
dc.relation.referencesSharkey, J., & Clavijo Olarte, A. (2012). Community-based pedagogies: Projects and possibilities in Colombia and the US. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 14(2), 121-136.
dc.relation.referencesSharkey, J. (2012). Community-based Pedagogies and Literacies in Language Teacher Education: Promising Beginnings, Intriguing Challenges. Íkala. 17(1). P. 9-13. ISSN 0123-3432.
dc.relation.referencesSharkey, J., Clavijo Olarte, A., & Ramírez, L. M. (2016). Developing a deeper understanding of community-based pedagogies with teachers: Learning with and from teachers in Colombia. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 306-319.
dc.relation.referencesSnow, Burns & Griffin (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
dc.relation.referencesSobel, D. (2004). Place-Based Education: Connecting Classrooms and Communities. Orion Society.
dc.relation.referencesStreet, (1994). Cross-cultural Approaches to Literacy. University of Cambridge.
dc.relation.referencesSoja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
dc.relation.referencesTuck, E. (2009). Re-visioning action: Participatory action research and indigenous theories of change. The Urban Review, 41(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0094-x
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (1958). Definition of literacy. En Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Literacy for Life (Paris: UNESCO).
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2006). Education for All: Literacy for Life; EFA Global Monitoring Report, 2006. Paris: UNESCO.
dc.relation.referencesVoces del Patrimonio – Tunjuelito. (2022, February 13). Voces del Patrimonio – Tunjuelito [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tki4A6W4skI
dc.relation.referencesWacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
dc.relation.referencesWaller, L. (2021). A sense of belonging at work: Building a strong culture of trust and belonging. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003187008
dc.relation.referencesWalsh, C. (2013). Pedagogías decoloniales: Prácticas insurgentes de resistir, (re)existir y (re)vivir. Ediciones Abya-Yala.
dc.relation.referencesWalsh, C. (2010). Intercultural studies in a decolonial key [Estudios (inter)culturales en clave de-colonial]. Tabula Rasa, 12.
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934).
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934).
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to finish. New York. The Guilford press.
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.subjectLiteracidades locales
dc.subjectPedagogía crítica
dc.subjectRelacionalidades alternativas
dc.subjectContexto sociocultural
dc.subjectVoces
dc.subjectAprendizaje de idiomas
dc.subject.keywordLocal literacies
dc.subject.keywordCritical pedagogy
dc.subject.keywordAlternative relationalities
dc.subject.keywordSociocultural context
dc.subject.keywordVoices
dc.subject.keywordLanguage learning
dc.subject.lembMaestría en Lingüística -- Tesis y disertaciones académicas
dc.subject.lembAlfabetización — Aspectos sociales
dc.subject.lembEducación secundaria — Participación estudiantil
dc.subject.lembPrácticas pedagógicas — Innovaciones educativas
dc.titleInvolucramiento de los estudiantes de grado décimo con literacidades locales mediante relacionalidades alternativas en tunjuelito
dc.title.alternativeEngaging with local literacies in tunjuelito
dc.title.titleenglishTenth graders’ local literacies engagement through alternative relationalities in tunjuelito
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.degreeMonografía
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
FuquenCamenSoniaAstrid2025.pdf
Tamaño:
4.02 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Licencia de uso y publicacion editable-2.pdf
Tamaño:
252.46 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
7 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: